Performance & Direction: Monsters in the Woods Review
Last updated: January 29, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Monsters in the Woods (2012) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 2.2/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Monsters in the Woods features a noteworthy lineup led by Glenn Plummer . Supported by the likes of Lee Perkins and Linda Bella , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Monsters in the Woods
Quick Plot Summary: Monsters in the Woods is a Horror film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Monsters in the Woods
Ending Breakdown: Monsters in the Woods attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the horror themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Monsters in the Woods reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Monsters in the Woods?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Horror films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Box Office Collection: Monsters in the Woods
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $30.0K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
Monsters in the Woods Budget
The estimated production budget for Monsters in the Woods is $30.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Top Cast: Monsters in the Woods
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Monsters in the Woods Online?
Streaming HubMonsters in the Woods Parents Guide & Age Rating
2012 AdvisoryWondering about Monsters in the Woods age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Monsters in the Woods is 83 minutes (1h 23m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 2.2/10, and global performance metrics, Monsters in the Woods is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 2012 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Monsters in the Woods worth watching?
Monsters in the Woods is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 2.2/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Monsters in the Woods parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Monsters in the Woods identifies it as R. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Monsters in the Woods?
The total duration of Monsters in the Woods is 83 minutes, which is approximately 1h 23m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Monsters in the Woods
How Monsters in the Woods Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Monsters in the Woods
Micro-budget, half-baked monster twaddle RELEASED IN 2012 and written/directed by Jason Horton, "Monsters in the Woods" is a micro-budget flick (costing a mere $30,000) about – you guessed it – monsters in the woods of Southern California that an indie film crew experience while shooting a B-horror flick. I like the diverse ethnic cast, which is refreshing, but the shaky, sometimes unfocused, cam gets tedious after a while. There are a few good-looking women. I also like the monsters, which are half-spider/half-human and impressively diabolic all things considered (it’s eventually explained WHY they’re so diabolic-looking). The first act is quite amusing as it parodies the trials & tribulations of a B-horror shoot in the sticks. Near the end of the first act, however, one of the main protagonists abruptly buys the farm and the reaction of the cast & crew is unconvincing but, then, I guess it’s supposed to be a joke anyway. The second act introduces two curious characters with head-scratching dialogue but, thankfully, the cool monsters are also introduced. Unfortunately, the proceedings and characters are dull and confusing as written and executed. Things finally perk up in the last act with revelations about what's really going on, but it can't save the flick from being what it is: half-baked. There's enough good here for a quality monster-in-the-woods horror movie, but Jason Horton needed to take the time to work the kinks out in the story/script, specifically in the second and final acts. George Romero did this with his original "Night of the Living Dead" (1968) and it remains a selling masterpiece to this day. The lesson? Don't rush off into the woods to shoot a horror flick with cast & crew, low-budget or not, UNTIL you have a well-written, comprehensible story with interesting characters. Otherwise you're just wasting your time and the time of anyone who might view your work. THE MOVIE RUNS 84 minutes and was shot in Fawnskin, San Bernardino National Forest (exteriors) and Malibu, California. GRADE: C-/D+
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
