Is Mr. Jones Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Mr. Jones is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Thriller movies.
It features a runtime of 119 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Mr. Jones is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Thriller, Drama, History genre.
Answer: Yes, Mr. Jones is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Thriller movies.
It features a runtime of 119 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2019, Mr. Jones emerges as a significant entry in the Thriller, Drama, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of In 1933, Welsh journalist Gareth Jones travels to Ukraine, where he experiences the horrors of a famine. Unlike standard genre fare, Mr. Jones attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Thriller is often anchored by its ensemble, and Mr. Jones features a noteworthy lineup led by James Norton . Supported by the likes of Vanessa Kirby and Peter Sarsgaard , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Mr. Jones (2019) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Mr. Jones is a Thriller, Drama, History film that builds tension through unpredictable twists and keeps audiences guessing until the final reveal. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Mr. Jones concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to thriller resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Mr. Jones reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Mr. Jones draws heavily from documented historical records. As a thriller, drama, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Mr. Jones adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $2.9M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |










Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTubeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.8/10, and global collection metrics, Mr. Jones stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2019 cinematic year.
Mr. Jones has received mixed reviews with a 6.8/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Mr. Jones is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Thriller, Drama, History movies, but read reviews first.
Mr. Jones may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
A taut and stark thriller, one part espionage, one part survival, this is an extremely powerful true story, and one that has generally slipped under the radar. We are lucky that someone as talented as Agnieszka Holland took the helm of 'Mr Jones'. - Jake Watt Read Jake's full article... https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-mr-jones-a-chilling-true-story
James Norton delivers really quite well here as the journalist who stumbles upon and exposes one of the worst atrocities of Stalin's Soviet regime. Deep amidst the poverty-stricken Steppe, he gradually becomes aware that the dissolution of the traditional small-holding style of family farm in favour of the creation of potentially more yielding grand scale operations is failing - and failing badly. Needless to say, this isn't news that the authorities wish to be conveyed to the wider world, and so his exploration becomes steadily more perilous. Fortunately, he has a degree of diplomatic status and he does try to be fair with his reporting. On the face of it, the plan had merits - greater space to exploit, centralised harvesting, centralised everything, basically. What went wrong? Well, those aspects of "Holodomor" as it became known aren't really explained so well here, so at times the lack of recorded fact leaves the historical elements frustratingly scantily dealt with. Still, the dramatic ones work well with Peter Sarsgaard on good form as is Vanessa Kirby and the clearly rather more objective approach to this tragedy taken by director Angieszka Holland presents us with the template of a catastrophe and let's us reach some conclusions about complicity of and/or the domination of a doctrine for ourselves rather potently. The effects and results are there, but the causes - well maybe that's not so straightforward than propagandists on either side might prefer us to think. It's largely filmed on location and that, paired with some intimate photography and a persuasive score from Antoni Lazarkiewicz, adds a richness to this story and delivers up a film that provokes thought and ought to stoke an interest in a famine that's probably little known of nowadays.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.