Is Nicholas and Alexandra Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Nicholas and Alexandra is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 189 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Nicholas and Alexandra is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, War, History genre.
Answer: Yes, Nicholas and Alexandra is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 189 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1971, Nicholas and Alexandra emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, War, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Tsar Nicholas II, the inept last monarch of Russia, insensitive to the needs of his people, is overthrown and exiled to Siberia with his family. Unlike standard genre fare, Nicholas and Alexandra attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Nicholas and Alexandra features a noteworthy lineup led by Michael Jayston . Supported by the likes of Janet Suzman and Roderic Noble , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Nicholas and Alexandra (1971) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Nicholas and Alexandra is a Drama, War, History film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Nicholas and Alexandra concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Nicholas and Alexandra reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Nicholas and Alexandra draws heavily from documented historical records. As a drama, war, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Nicholas and Alexandra adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:










Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.9/10, and global collection metrics, Nicholas and Alexandra stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1971 cinematic year.
Nicholas and Alexandra has received mixed reviews with a 6.9/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Nicholas and Alexandra is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, War, History movies, but read reviews first.
Nicholas and Alexandra may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
To be fair to Sam Spiegel, he didn’t hold the purse strings too tightly on this sumptuous dramatisation of the lives of Czar Nicholas II (Michael Jayston) and his wife Alexandra (Janet Suzman) and it looks almost as stunning as “Doctor Zhivago” (1965). Sadly, though, that look doesn’t translate into anything very compelling to watch as neither lead actor really has what it takes to enliven either their roles or the tumultuous events at this fascinatingly turbulent time in European history. Luck isn’t exactly on the Romanov side right from the start when their only son Alexis is born with haemophilia, the Czarina finds herself under the sinister influence of Rasputin (the reliably hammy Tom Baker) and he finds his nation involved - on the losing side - in a war against Japan in Korea and with a domestic population no longer prepared to automatically accept the divine right of the emperor. What now ensues uses some large-scale, grand, cinematography intertwined with the excellent attention paid to the costume and production designs to depict historical events but I found this really more a victory for style over substance. Sir Larry Olivier can just about carry of his role as his sagely and increasingly frustrated premier Count Witte and Irene Worth always did possess a certain imperiousness that works well here as the Dowager Empress but I struggled with Harry Andrews, Timothy West and especially with a Jack Hawkins who looked like he had bathed in aspic before attaching a moustache he borrowed from a Marx brother. It comes alive a little with half an hour to go as a certain inevitable mortality impacts on this Imperial family, but I still felt it a passionless and rather sterile depiction of the hypocrisies and double standards that prevailed in a country where a palace and a ghetto existed side by side and where religious mysticism and the positively Machiavellian nature of the political machinations were rife. An opportunity missed, I would say, that really could have benefited from casting that didn’t worry so much about actual resemblance but more on substantive characterisation and perhaps focussed on a shorter, more concentrated, timeframe.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.