Is Night of the Demon Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Night of the Demon is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Night of the Demon is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Night of the Demon is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1980, Night of the Demon emerges as a significant entry in the Horror domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of An anthropology professor and his students attempt to track down a Bigfoot responsible for a rash of violent murders, only to uncover something even more sinister. Unlike standard genre fare, Night of the Demon attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Night of the Demon features a noteworthy lineup led by Michael Cutt . Supported by the likes of Paul Kelleher and Melanie Graham , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Night of the Demon (1980) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Night of the Demon is a Horror film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Night of the Demon attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Night of the Demon reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $70.0K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Night of the Demon is $70.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.


Night Flight Plus
Eternal Family
Troma NOW
Amazon Video
Fandango At Home
Amazon Video
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.9/10, and global collection metrics, Night of the Demon stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1980 cinematic year.
Night of the Demon is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.9/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.9/10, Night of the Demon may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Night of the Demon is currently available for streaming on Night Flight Plus. You can also check for it on platforms like Night Flight Plus, Eternal Family, Troma NOW depending on your region.
This movie is pretty crazy with the story and the effects are decent. A bit hard to believe this was considered a "video nasty" during its release but I guess some of the death are brutal there. Definitely worth seeing this Bigfoot creature go murderous and then some in this film.
**_Gory flick originally intended to be called “The Revenge of Bigfoot”_** Mostly shot in 1979, this indie only cost $70,000 at the time and borrows the set-up of “Shriek of the Mutilated” from seven years prior, which involves a professor taking several students out to the remote woods to find a particularly dangerous Sasquatch. The second half is altogether different, however, with elements reminiscent of several movies, including the farmhouse showdown of “Night of the Living Dead,” the ‘redneck’ bits of “Squirm,” the legalistic abuse of “Carrie” and the infamous guts sequence of “Dawn of the Living Dead.” The movie is notorious for being listed as a “video nasty” by the BBFC and deserved it due the gore, nudity and rape scene. Yet the original version by James Wasson was rather tame. What happened is that Wasson’s original version was shown at a local film festival where it performed poorly, but piqued the interest of producer Jim Ball, who then shot a number of shocking gory sequences in Hollywood to insert into the film. Wasson had nothing to do with these additional scenes. Amazingly, the inserted parts don’t feel inorganic to the proceedings and worked to stir interest in the film. Michael Cutt works well enough as the masculine professor and blonde Jodi Lazarus is a highlight on the feminine front as Linda, but the rest of the students and some peripherals are forgettable with relatively wooden readings of their lines, except for Crazy Wanda (Melanie Graham). Despite some subpar acting, the story surprisingly maintains interest with a dated-but-eerie score adding to the mood. It helps that the creature is formidable when finally revealed, although critics say he looks too man-like as opposed to ape-ish. The reason the title was changed to “Night of the Demon” is because Bigfoot flicks had lost their appeal by 1980. Of course, calling the creature a ‘demon’ is only fitting in a figurative sense. It runs 1h 36m and was shot in Valencia, California, which is 36 miles northwest of Los Angeles, just north of Santa Clarita. The bits done in the studio were filmed back in the city. GRADE: B-
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.