Is Nightmare Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Nightmare is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Nightmare is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime, Mystery, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Nightmare is likely a skip if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1956, Nightmare emerges as a significant entry in the Crime, Mystery, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Clarinetist Stan has a nightmare about killing a man in a mirrored room. Unlike standard genre fare, Nightmare attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and Nightmare features a noteworthy lineup led by Edward G. Robinson . Supported by the likes of Kevin McCarthy and Connie Russell , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Nightmare (1956) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Nightmare is a Crime, Mystery, Thriller film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Nightmare attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to crime resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Nightmare reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Nightmare incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime, mystery, thriller film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Nightmare adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:








Amazon Prime Video
ScreenPix Apple TV Channel
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
ScreenPix Amazon Channel Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.9/10, and global collection metrics, Nightmare stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1956 cinematic year.
Nightmare has received mixed reviews with a 5.9/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Nightmare is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Crime, Mystery, Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
Nightmare is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, ScreenPix Apple TV Channel, Amazon Prime Video with Ads, ScreenPix Amazon Channel depending on your region.
Stan Grayson is in a Jazz Funk. Maxwell Shane remakes his own 1947 film Fear in the Night but with a better known cast and more money. Adapted from Cornell Woolrich's novel, story has Stan Grayson (Kevin McCarthy) as a New Orleans clarinetist who dreams he has committed a murder in a heavily mirrored room. Upon waking he finds clues that suggest he actually may have killed a man and frantically turns to his police detective brother-in-law, Rene Bressard (Edward G. Robinson), for help. But it doesn't look good for Stan... Fear in the Night is a good film, and so is this, but if you have seen the earlier version then this feels very much perfunctory. The opening titles are superb, as melted candle wax plays host to the roll call shown in moody dissolves. We jump into Grayson's dream, again this is very well constructed on noirish terms, and from there on in it's a competently crafted visual film noir picture with good tension and splendid jazzy interludes. However, nothing else makes it stand out, it just sort of exists as an exercise in late noir cycle film making, a pic that doesn't want to even try to push boundaries. The cast are dependable in performances, but nothing to really grab the attention, though Shane does work near wonders to cloak the characters in various levels of paranoia or suspicious machinations. New Orleans locales are a bonus, with cinematographer Joseph Biroc excelling at sweaty close-ups and the utilisation of shadows as foreboding presence's. It all resolves itself in a whirl of improbability, but as most film noir fans will tell you, that's actually OK. Yet this is still a film that's far from essential viewing for the like minded noir crowd. More so if you have happened to have seen the 1947 version first. 6/10
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.