Is Nixon Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Nixon is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 192 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Nixon is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, History genre.
Answer: Yes, Nixon is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 192 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1995, Nixon emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A look at President Richard M. Unlike standard genre fare, Nixon attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Nixon features a noteworthy lineup led by Anthony Hopkins . Supported by the likes of Joan Allen and Powers Boothe , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Nixon (1995) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Nixon is a Drama, History film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Nixon concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Nixon reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Nixon draws heavily from documented historical records. As a drama, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Nixon adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $44.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $13.7M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for Nixon is $44.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.9/10, and global collection metrics, Nixon stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1995 cinematic year.
Nixon has received mixed reviews with a 6.9/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Nixon is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, History movies, but read reviews first.
Nixon is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, Amazon Prime Video with Ads depending on your region.
Wow, this was a pretty fair movie wasn't it? And it came from Oliver Stone. One would almost expect it to be a paranoid mess, but it was done pretty well. Hopkins did a great job too... except maybe looking a little too old for the role, but he captured a lot of Nixon's mannerisms, a lot of how he spoke and moved. It was far from uncanny, but he really did nail the essence of the character and that is almost better than cloning him. Joan Allen fails though. She doesn't exactly ape Pat as well as she could and you are left with the impression that she doesn't understand who she was depicting. And then you have little hints at the Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories and, even though I supported them, I don't think that they had a place in a movie about Nixon. They felt alien and X-Files and you are left doubting that said conversation ever took place. Aside from all of that, though, this seems like a great film that was fairly done, about someone that it would have been far too easy to stereotype as a drooling monster. Stone humanized him, and that took heart and talent.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.