Performance & Direction: Objects in the Rearview Review
Last updated: January 23, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Objects in the Rearview (2013) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 3.0/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Drama.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Objects in the Rearview features a noteworthy lineup led by David Futernick . Supported by the likes of Mekenna Melvin and Kim Shaw , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Objects in the Rearview (2013) is negative. With an audience rating of 3.0/10, it stands as a challenging project that may struggle to find an audience.
Story & Plot Summary: Objects in the Rearview
Quick Plot Summary: Objects in the Rearview is a Drama, Romance film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through detailed character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Objects in the Rearview
Ending Breakdown: Objects in the Rearview attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the drama themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Objects in the Rearview reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Objects in the Rearview?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Drama films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Objects in the Rearview
All Cast & Crew →Objects in the Rearview Parents Guide & Age Rating
2013 AdvisoryWondering about Objects in the Rearview age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Objects in the Rearview is 17 minutes (17m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 3.0/10, and global performance metrics, Objects in the Rearview is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 2013 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Objects in the Rearview worth watching?
Objects in the Rearview is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies. It has a verified rating of 3/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Objects in the Rearview parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Objects in the Rearview identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Objects in the Rearview?
The total duration of Objects in the Rearview is 17 minutes, which is approximately 0h 17m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Objects in the Rearview
How Objects in the Rearview Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Objects in the Rearview
No reviews found for this filter.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.













