Is Panic Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Panic is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Panic is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.1/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Science Fiction genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Panic is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1982, Panic emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Science Fiction domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A scientist's experiment with a deadly bacteria goes awry and leaves him horribly deformed. Unlike standard genre fare, Panic attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Panic features a noteworthy lineup led by David Warbeck . Supported by the likes of Janet Ågren and Roberto Ricci , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Panic (1982) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.1/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Panic is a Horror, Science Fiction film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Panic attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Panic reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:







Fandango At Home
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.1/10, and global collection metrics, Panic stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1982 cinematic year.
Panic is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.1/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.1/10, Panic may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Panic may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
I have to give full marks to an Italian movie, set in a small town in England, that starts off with infected experimental rats going amok in an aspirin-manufacturing company's laboratory, then straight to two of the monster's first victims having sex in a car--all in the first five minutes. That's fine pacing for a low-budget film. It was certainly enjoyable and a fun watch--too bad the film was uneven, and that breakneck (pardon the pun!) pace of its start couldn't be maintained. An intriguing premise, of a clandestine germ-warfare experiment gone awry, and both the government and police being in on the ultimate 'Plan Q'--destroying all life (people and animals) in the city--claiming it's 'better to kill 1,000 early than have to kill 1,000,000 later'. With the right budget for makeup and acting, and in the right screenwriting and directorial hands, this could have really been something, far more than the 'so-bad-it's-good' territory 'Panic' holds. I thoroughly enjoyed the attempt, however--the homages to 'Psycho', 'The Third Man' and other great films really brought a smile to my face. Movies like THIS, in which the ambition far outrun the result, are ones that should be remade, in my humble opinion.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.