Is Patton Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Patton is definitely worth watching if you enjoy War movies.
It features a runtime of 172 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Patton is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.5/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the War, Drama, History genre.
Answer: Yes, Patton is definitely worth watching if you enjoy War movies.
It features a runtime of 172 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1970, Patton emerges as a significant entry in the War, Drama, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of "Patton" tells the tale of General George S. Unlike standard genre fare, Patton attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a refreshing take on its central themes.
The success of any War is often anchored by its ensemble, and Patton features a noteworthy lineup led by George C. Scott . Supported by the likes of Karl Malden and Stephen Young , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Patton (1970) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.5/10, it stands as a mandatory watch for any serious cinema lover.
Quick Plot Summary: Patton is a War, Drama, History film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The film presents its narrative with careful attention to pacing and character development. "Patton" tells the tale of General George S. Patton, famous tank commander of World War II. The film begins with Patton's career in North Africa and progresses through the invasion of Germany and the fall of the Third Reich. Side plots also speak of Patton's numerous faults such his temper and habit towards insubordination. The story unfolds naturally, allowing viewers to become invested in the outcome while maintaining engagement throughout.
Ending Breakdown: Patton resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to war resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, creating a memorable conclusion that audiences have responded to positively.
The final moments of Patton demonstrate careful narrative planning, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Patton draws heavily from documented historical records. As a war, drama, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film balances historical fidelity with cinematic storytelling. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
The production demonstrates respect for its source material, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Patton successfully translates real events into compelling cinema. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Highly Recommended For:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $12.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $89.8M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for Patton is $12.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Spectrum On Demand
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7.5/10, and global collection metrics, Patton stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1970 cinematic year.
Patton is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7.5/10, it's highly recommended for fans of War, Drama, History movies.
Yes, Patton is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of War, Drama, History cinema.
Patton may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
I love it. God help me I do love it so. I love it more than my life. Patton is directed by Franklin J Schaffner and is adapted to screenplay by Francis Ford Coppola and Edmund H. North from Ladislas Farago's "Patton: Ordeal and Triumph" and Omar N. Bradley's "A Soldier's Story". It stars George C Scott, Karl Malden, Michael Bates, Edward Binns, John Doucette, Stephen Young, Michael Strong and Cary Loftin. Music is by Jerry Goldsmith and cinematography by Fred J. Koenekamp. Pic is a part biography of George S. Patton Jr. which follows his exploits in WWII until his retirement from service. Released at the time of the Vietnam War, there's a certain bravado in the makers choosing this period to release a biopic about one of America's most famous - and controversial - military characters. Led by a tour de force performance by Scott as Patton, Shaffner and his team rightly portray the man as full of flag waving bluster, gigantic egotism and majestic tenderness. The complexity of the man in Scott's hands is what drives the film to greater heights. Schaffner's (Planet of the Apes) shows a smart eye for battle scene construction (shot in 70 millimetre - Dimension 150), this puts us viewers right in amongst the horrors of warfare. The supporting cast do sterling work in the face of Scott's barnstorming show, which when all told as a film leaves us with a war biography of great depth and one that rightly is held up as a marker for such genre ventures. 9/10
**A good film about one of the most controversial generals of the Second World War.** Patton is one of the most controversial generals of World War II. A man guided by his killer instinct rather than reason, he played a relevant role in the defeat of the Germans, but he also took conflicts that greatly tarnished his military record. A US cavalry officer, he fought in the First World War and is one of the biggest names in the development of tanks and armored cars, both at the level of conception and strategy, where he valued rapid movements and aggressiveness. In World War II, he led Operation Torch, faced the German general Rommel and openly competed with Montgomery, who was more prudent in his approach. But he also blatantly ignored superior orders and assaulted soldiers who did not appear committed, so he was harshly censured and only recovered after the Battle of the Ardennes, when he supported the Allied forces. I think I can join most people in saying that the strong point here is the very solid performance of George C. Scott: he was extraordinarily convincing in the role of the “Bandit” (one of the many barracks nicknames that Patton collected). He effortlessly steals all the attention and is a more than solid protagonist, to which we can add a consistent and competent supporting cast, featuring the worthy Karl Malden and Michael Bates. Expertly directed by Franklin J. Schaffner, the film features a magnificent script. I'm a historian, but I'm not an expert on the period in question and, therefore, I'm not the right person to evaluate the film's historical realism. However, I can say that I didn't see any glaring errors. The cinematography is very colorful and bright, making the most of the excellent sets, costumes and filming locations, which reproduce very well the settings and environments. However, if what you want is a war film with a lot of action, I have doubts about recommending this one: there isn't much here, except for some good fights. The film did well in the market, was profitable, and the critics were very receptive. In 1971, it won seven of the ten Oscars for which it was nominated, namely Best Director, Best Art Direction, Best Editing, Best Sound, Best Original Screenplay, Best Actor (for Scott, who refused to accept it for not agreeing with the competition) and Best Film.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.



Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise