Is Pharaoh Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Pharaoh is definitely worth watching if you enjoy History movies.
It features a runtime of 151 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Pharaoh is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the History, Drama genre.
Answer: Yes, Pharaoh is definitely worth watching if you enjoy History movies.
It features a runtime of 151 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1966, Pharaoh emerges as a significant entry in the History, Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Young Pharaoh Ramses XIII clashes with Egypt's clergy over influence on the affairs of the state and its coffers. Unlike standard genre fare, Pharaoh attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any History is often anchored by its ensemble, and Pharaoh features a noteworthy lineup led by Jerzy Zelnik . Supported by the likes of Wiesława Mazurkiewicz and Barbara Brylska , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Pharaoh (1966) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.7/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Pharaoh is a History, Drama film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Pharaoh concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to history resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Pharaoh reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Pharaoh draws heavily from documented historical records. As a history, drama film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Pharaoh adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $10.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $10.0M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for Pharaoh is $10.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










FilminAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.7/10, and global collection metrics, Pharaoh stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1966 cinematic year.
Pharaoh has received mixed reviews with a 6.7/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Pharaoh is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of History, Drama movies, but read reviews first.
Pharaoh is currently available for streaming on Filmin. You can also check for it on platforms like Filmin depending on your region.
I’m always surprised that given the huge breadth of stories from Egypt’s pantheon and it’s history, that so few films have ever - Jack Hawkins and Victor Mature, notwithstanding - been made for mainstream cinema. This one from Pole Jerzy Kawalerowicz tells the story of the fictitious Prince “Ramses” (Jerzy Zelnik) as he strives for his ailing Pharaoh father’s approval in the face of hostility from the High Priest “Herhor” (Piotr Pawlowski) and those who would ensure the king ruled in name only. With precious few soldiers, the young prince is fully aware that their borders are unsecured and with plotting and scheming going on all around him, he knows that in order to reign as he would want, he is going to have to bring down the all-powerful priesthood. It doesn’t help his situation that his lover just happens to be “Sarah” (Krystyna Mikolajewska) and as her name suggests, she has as much Egyptian blood flowing through her veins as Yul Brynner. When she gives birth to a son, and then he accedes to the red and white crowns, the battle lines become violently drawn. He wants the temples to release their vast golden treasure of the labyrinth, they are declining and what the new king doesn’t realise is that he has a doppelgänger in “Lykon” who is in love with the spurned and now treacherous priestess “Kama” (Barbara Brylska) so “Herhor” has a cunning plan to ensure his grip on power remains intact. The plot itself is a bit of a muddle borrowing from just about everyone from Dumas to Cecil B. deMille, but the filming on location allows the photography to do much of the heavy lifting amidst the great temples and pyramids, and both Zelnik and Pawlowski deliver considered, if perhaps not so exuberant, performances as this history plays out. Readers of Christian Jacq might recognise the stories that pitted the might of the priests who served the gods with that of the pharaoh was was supposed to be one, and in the end this displays those power plays, as well as the odd orgy, quite conspiratorially well. The production is designed to look realistic, there are no gadgets and exotic machines of war, just men in sandals with spears, woven shields and chariots for the generals and the whole film has a genuine look to it that I appreciated.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.