Is Population 436 Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Population 436 is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 88 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Population 436 is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Population 436 is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 88 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2006, Population 436 emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A census-taker is sent to investigate why a certain small town has had the same population -- 436 residents -- for the last 100 years. Unlike standard genre fare, Population 436 attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Population 436 features a noteworthy lineup led by Jeremy Sisto . Supported by the likes of Charlotte Sullivan and Fred Durst , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Population 436 (2006) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Population 436 is a Horror, Thriller film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Population 436 attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Population 436 reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:









Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.8/10, and global collection metrics, Population 436 stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2006 cinematic year.
Population 436 has received mixed reviews with a 5.8/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Population 436 is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Horror, Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
Population 436 may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
_**A small town in the backwoods is infected by twisted legalism**_ A census bureau worker from Chicago (Jeremy Sisto) is assigned to a strange remote town in North Dakota whose population stays at 436. Will he make it out? “Population 436” (2006) is a slow-burn mystery/horror in the mold of “The Wicker Man” (1973/2006) and the later “Apostle” (2018). If you favor those movies this is more of the same, but different enough to stand on its own. The movie has the confidence to take its time plus keeps everything realistic, relatively speaking. The lovely Charlotte Sullivan stands out as a young woman in the town while Fred Durst, the lead singer of Limp Bizkit, plays the likable deputy. The film runs 1 hour, 32 minutes, and was shot around Roseisle, Manitoba, about 50 miles north of the border of eastern North Dakota. GRADE: B-/B
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.