Is Psycho Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Psycho is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 104 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Psycho is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.1/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Mystery, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Psycho is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 104 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1998, Psycho emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Mystery, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A young female embezzler arrives at the Bates Motel, which has terrible secrets of its own. Unlike standard genre fare, Psycho attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Psycho features a noteworthy lineup led by Vince Vaughn . Supported by the likes of Anne Heche and Julianne Moore , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Psycho (1998) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.1/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Psycho is a Horror, Mystery, Thriller film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The horror unfolds through carefully crafted atmosphere and escalating dread. A young female embezzler arrives at the Bates Motel, which has terrible secrets of its own. The film uses both psychological terror and visceral scares, building tension through what's unseen as much as what's shown. The pacing allows for breathing room between scares, making each frightening moment more effective.
Ending Breakdown: Psycho attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Psycho reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $25.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $37.1M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Psycho is $25.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










VI movies and tv
Hungama Play
Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.1/10, and global collection metrics, Psycho stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1998 cinematic year.
Psycho has received mixed reviews with a 5.1/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Psycho is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Horror, Mystery, Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
Psycho is currently available for streaming on VI movies and tv. You can also check for it on platforms like VI movies and tv depending on your region.
Horror fans really should thank Gus Van Sant for his experimental "copy exactly" approach to re-making the horror classic Psycho. Filmmakers have learned that just modernizing the original with a bigger budget takes no creativity and falls into tedium and redundancy which most horror fan's hate. Gus Van Sant's Psycho remake, where nearly every scene is "copied exactly," is a perfect example of this. It was simply BORING. Even for those that never saw this first, the pacing is just too slow for the high-octane generations of the 90's and beyond. For a re-make to resonate with an audience that knows the original by heart, it has to deliver a new and different version while staying within the bounds of the original framework. We should be thankful because no director will try this again. For the secret formula to successful horror re-makes, watch 2012's The Evil Dead, 2004's Dawn of the Dead or David Cronenberg's The Fly (1986).
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.