Is Pusher III Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Pusher III is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 108 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Pusher III is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.2/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the Action, Thriller, Crime genre.
Answer: Yes, Pusher III is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 108 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2005, Pusher III emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Thriller, Crime domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Milo is aging, he is planning his daughter's 25th birthday, and his shipment of heroin turns out to be 10,000 pills of ecstasy. Unlike standard genre fare, Pusher III attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a refreshing take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Pusher III features a noteworthy lineup led by Zlatko Burić . Supported by the likes of Marinela Dekic and Slavko Labović , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Pusher III (2005) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.2/10, it stands as a mandatory watch for any serious cinema lover.
Quick Plot Summary: Pusher III is a Action, Thriller, Crime film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Pusher III resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to action resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Pusher III reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Pusher III incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a action, thriller, crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film balances historical fidelity with cinematic storytelling. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
The production demonstrates respect for its source material, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Pusher III adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:







Amazon Prime Video
Philo
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Amazon Video
YouTube
Fandango At Home
FlixFling
Amazon Video
YouTube
Fandango At Home
FlixFlingAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7.2/10, and global collection metrics, Pusher III stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2005 cinematic year.
Pusher III is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7.2/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Action, Thriller, Crime movies.
Yes, Pusher III is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of Action, Thriller, Crime cinema.
Pusher III is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, Philo, Amazon Prime Video with Ads depending on your region.
Weakest of the three, for me. For large portions of 'Pusher 3' I was not truly feeling it as it was giving major 6/10 vibes, yet by the time it's gut-wrenching (pardon the pun?) final few scenes had concluded I actually wasn't unhappy with what I had just sat through. As noted, I do believe it's below the original two flicks but it kinda works still. The major reason for that is Zlatko Burić. I'm not sure what it is about his (relatively low-key) acting but I just really enjoy watching him perform. He's solid enough in the 1996 and 2004 flicks and I like him in 2012, so finally getting to see him in a lead role I was actually unsure if he was lead worthy - but he is, just about. Burić kept my interest in the film alive, that's a fact. I see he later 'reprised' the role of Milo in the 2012 remake... weirdly. I'll have to check it out one day. The rest of the film doesn't spring any major thoughts into my head, if I'm truthful. I will not forget that final act though - they sure went there!
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise