Queen of Blood
Performance & Direction: Queen of Blood Review
Last updated: February 5, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Queen of Blood (1966) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.2/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Science Fiction.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Science Fiction is often anchored by its ensemble, and Queen of Blood features a noteworthy lineup led by Florence Marly . Supported by the likes of Basil Rathbone and John Saxon , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Queen of Blood
Quick Plot Summary: Queen of Blood is a Science Fiction, Horror film that explores futuristic concepts and technological possibilities while examining humanity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Queen of Blood
Ending Breakdown: Queen of Blood attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to science fiction resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the science fiction themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Queen of Blood reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Queen of Blood?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Science Fiction films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Box Office Collection: Queen of Blood
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $65.0K |
| Worldwide Gross | $1.7M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
Queen of Blood Budget
The estimated production budget for Queen of Blood is $65.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Top Cast: Queen of Blood
All Cast & Crew →






Where to Watch Queen of Blood Online?
Streaming HubQueen of Blood Parents Guide & Age Rating
1966 AdvisoryWondering about Queen of Blood age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Queen of Blood is 81 minutes (1h 21m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.2/10, and global performance metrics, Queen of Blood is classified as a AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1966 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Queen of Blood worth watching?
Queen of Blood is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Science Fiction movies. It has a verified rating of 5.2/10 and stands as a AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Queen of Blood parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Queen of Blood identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Queen of Blood?
The total duration of Queen of Blood is 81 minutes, which is approximately 1h 21m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Queen of Blood
How Queen of Blood Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Queen of Blood
**_Eerie sci-fi from the mid-60s with the help of footage from a few Russian flicks_** In the near-future, when Earthlings have a moon base and can travel to nearby planets, a radio transmission is received from Mars wherein an alien craft has crash-landed and needs assistance. Two spaceships are sent on the rescue mission, but serious problems manifest on the return voyage. The cast is headed by John Saxon, Basil Rathbone and Dennis Hopper. “Queen of Blood,” aka “Planet of Blood” (1966), is an interesting movie in that it uses stock footage from a few Russian films (cited below) as ‘frosting’ on the cake of an entirely different story, resulting in a moody, slow-burn sci-fi experience. People compare it to the Italian "Planet of the Vampires” from the year prior, but this has a more compelling story. Both of these flicks obviously influenced superior future films, like “Alien” and “Lifeforce.” While I suppose the two women in “Planet of the Vampires” are superior (a blonde and a redhead no less), Judi Meredith isn’t exactly a slouch and Florence Marly is effective as the mysteriously seductive green-skinned extraterrestrial. The movie was released the same year that Star Trek debuted. If you appreciate serious Star Trek episodes from its first season, you’ll appreciate what “Queen of Blood” has to offer. I’m talking about episodes like "The Cage," "Where No Man Has Gone Before," "The Corbomite Maneuver," "Enemy Within," "The Man Trap," "The Naked Time," "Charlie X," "Balance of Terror" and "What Are Little Girls Made Of?" Executive producer Roger Corman purchased stock footage from a few Russian films to beef-up the production values of his low-budget movies in the mid-60s. As such, most of the F/X in “Queen of Blood” hail from “A Dream Come True” (1963), including the Martian sequences and elaborate miniatures of the launch of the extraterrestrial ‘mother ship.’ The animated exteriors of some of the Earth vessel sequences are from either “Planet of Storms” (1962) or “Battle Beyond the Sun” (1959), which had already been used for “Voyage to the Prehistoric Planet” the previous year. The movie runs 1 hour, 18 minutes, and the new footage (by director Curtis Harrington) was shot at a studio in Los Angeles. GRADE: B
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.








