Is Raid on Rommel Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Raid on Rommel is likely a skip if you enjoy War movies.
It features a runtime of 99 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Raid on Rommel is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the War, Action genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Raid on Rommel is likely a skip if you enjoy War movies.
It features a runtime of 99 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1971, Raid on Rommel emerges as a significant entry in the War, Action domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Captain Foster plans on raiding German-occupied Tobruk with hand- picked commandos, but a mixup leaves him with a medical unit led by a Quaker conscientious objector. Unlike standard genre fare, Raid on Rommel attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any War is often anchored by its ensemble, and Raid on Rommel features a noteworthy lineup led by Richard Burton . Supported by the likes of John Colicos and Wolfgang Preiss , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Raid on Rommel (1971) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Raid on Rommel is a War, Action film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Raid on Rommel attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to war resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Raid on Rommel reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Raid on Rommel uses real-world events as narrative inspiration. As a war, action film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Raid on Rommel adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:









BINGEAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.8/10, and global collection metrics, Raid on Rommel stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1971 cinematic year.
Raid on Rommel has received mixed reviews with a 5.8/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Raid on Rommel is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of War, Action movies, but read reviews first.
Raid on Rommel is currently available for streaming on BINGE. You can also check for it on platforms like BINGE depending on your region.
Is it just me, or is this just a fairly straightforward remake of “Tobruk” (1967)? Instead of Rock we have Richard, Burton, as he sets off deep behind enemy lines in North Africa to destroy a fuel dump that is going to help mobilise a couple of Panzer divisions for Rommel. He is supposed to take a crack team with him, but a mix up sees him saddled with a doctor (Clinton Greyn) and his patients who couldn’t hit a bull on the backside with an bulldozer. Things become even more precarious when they find themselves talking Prussian brown stamps with the Field Marshall himself (Wolfgang Preiss) - but maybe that might allow the observant “Foster” (Burton) to catch a glimpse of some top secret maps? From now on in, I could swear it actually uses some of the same footage from the other movie, especially at the end - which is certainly the best part of the film. Burton does enough, but nothing more really, and I couldn’t quite figure out just what Danielle De Metz was doing here at all. It takes the usual pop at the inadequacies of the Italians during the war, and it also endeavours to make Rommel out to be a civilised gentleman à la James Mason, but otherwise it’s really just a vehicle for a star who looked like he had bleached his hair specially for the part. It passes the time if you like the genre, but nothing more, sorry.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.