Is Rapid Fire Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Rapid Fire is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Verdict:Rapid Fire is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Crime, Thriller, TV Movie genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Rapid Fire is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2006, Rapid Fire emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Crime, Thriller, TV Movie domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A desperate band of Militia men attempts a daylight bank robbery in the sleepy semi-rural City of Norco, California, and leads the local Police on the longest, most violent running gun battle in Law Enforcement history. Unlike standard genre fare, Rapid Fire attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Rapid Fire features a noteworthy lineup led by David Cubitt . Supported by the likes of Kristin Lehman and Jason Gedrick , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Rapid Fire (2006) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.3/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Rapid Fire is a Action, Crime, Thriller, TV Movie film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Rapid Fire attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Rapid Fire reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Rapid Fire incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a action, crime, thriller, tv movie film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Rapid Fire adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.3/10, and global collection metrics, Rapid Fire stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2006 cinematic year.
Rapid Fire is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.3/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.3/10, Rapid Fire may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Rapid Fire may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
No reviews found for this filter.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.