[REC]⁴ Apocalypse
Performance & Direction: [REC]⁴ Apocalypse Review
Last updated: January 23, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is [REC]⁴ Apocalypse (2014) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.6/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Thriller.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Thriller is often anchored by its ensemble, and [REC]⁴ Apocalypse features a noteworthy lineup led by Manuela Velasco . Supported by the likes of Paco Manzanedo and Héctor Colomé , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of [REC]⁴ Apocalypse (2014) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: [REC]⁴ Apocalypse
Quick Plot Summary: [REC]⁴ Apocalypse is a Thriller, Horror film that builds tension through unpredictable twists and keeps audiences guessing until the final reveal. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Story Breakdown
The plot weaves a complex web of mystery and suspense. Ángela Vidal, the young television reporter who entered the building with the firemen, manages to make it out alive. But what the soldiers don't know is that she carries the seed of the strange infection. She is to be taken to a provisional quarantine facility, a high-security installation where she will have to stay in isolation for several days. An old oil tanker, miles off shore and surrounded by water on all sides, has been especially equipped for the quarantine. Information is revealed strategically, keeping viewers engaged as they piece together clues alongside the protagonist. The narrative maintains momentum through well-timed revelations and unexpected turns.
Narrative Structure
- Opening Hook: The opening scene plants the seeds of mystery, introducing questions that will drive the narrative forward.
- Character Arc: Character development is present but somewhat formulaic, following familiar patterns without adding fresh perspectives to the genre.
- Climax & Resolution: All mysteries converge in a climax that recontextualizes earlier events and delivers satisfying answers.
Ending Explained: [REC]⁴ Apocalypse
Ending Breakdown: [REC]⁴ Apocalypse attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to thriller resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the thriller themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of [REC]⁴ Apocalypse reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch [REC]⁴ Apocalypse?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Thriller films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Box Office Collection: [REC]⁴ Apocalypse
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $3.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $4.9M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
[REC]⁴ Apocalypse Budget
The estimated production budget for [REC]⁴ Apocalypse is $3.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Top Cast: [REC]⁴ Apocalypse
All Cast & Crew →








Where to Watch [REC]⁴ Apocalypse Online?
Streaming Hub[REC]⁴ Apocalypse Parents Guide & Age Rating
2014 AdvisoryWondering about [REC]⁴ Apocalypse age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of [REC]⁴ Apocalypse is 95 minutes (1h 35m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.6/10, and global collection metrics, [REC]⁴ Apocalypse stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2014 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is [REC]⁴ Apocalypse worth watching?
[REC]⁴ Apocalypse is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Thriller movies. It has a verified rating of 5.6/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find [REC]⁴ Apocalypse parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for [REC]⁴ Apocalypse identifies it as R. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of [REC]⁴ Apocalypse?
The total duration of [REC]⁴ Apocalypse is 95 minutes, which is approximately 1h 35m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked [REC]⁴ Apocalypse
How [REC]⁴ Apocalypse Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for [REC]⁴ Apocalypse
> When the source followed straight to the isolated lab. It looks like been ages. I know the movies (the previous three), but can't remember the scenes. A quick recap would have been helpful, but I did not do that and went ahead with this. That's the reason I hate to follow television series on the broadcast which drag one season for over 6 months. This was the fourth film in the [Rec] film series and third in the story continuation after first two. The third installment was set in the parallel timeline to that before one, but off the track narration. In this, an old woman character was brought on-board to make sure the third film was not an offbeat from the series. Except the opening few minutes, the rest of the story takes place on a moving ship. Kind of similar to 'Sector 7', though both the flicks are entirely different. The ship is used as a laboratory to develop a vaccine for the deadly disease which turns humans into the flesh eating zombies. It is protected by the armed paramilitary force. Somehow the virus breaks loose, the infection spreads out quickly through the various platforms like lab monkeys and foods. How the survivours fight to remain alive in the nowhere of the ocean is the remaining narrative. If there is a way, how they make it out that comes with the intensified gore battle between the undead and the living. I never expected another film in the series, I thought it was a trilogy, but after seeing this I felt the idea was not that bad after all. Just like the 'Jurassic Park' movies, the fourth movie puts the franchise back on the track after the third was derailed. The first film was so good and a bit scary too, followed by another decent movie. Like I mentioned the third flick was different, but a sustainable one to the theme and title. > "I don not know what was going on, > but luckily I was not there." This story starts off with a slow, until the third act where the pace picks up rapidly. Not scary, but towards the final sequences, it was very fast and edgy. The way it concluded, the outro scene was a hint for another film in the franchise. But in my opinion, it should have ended with three films or with this one. Hoping for a better one if there is going to be another [Rec], because my rating in numeral declining by one point following the each sequel. I think the suspense should have maintained well. There were some tiny twists and turns on the weak movie plot, but I anticipated the final twist and it did not deliver with that effectively. I know the theme was built on the situation, not depended on prolonged story. Because the action speaks more than any kind of development to give a clean vision on happening. After all, most of the horror movies follow the same sutra, but sometimes the horror-dramas exclude it and this is not one of that. Its a collective performance, individually, not noticeable. Because it does not follow any particular character. Though the character Angela, the television reporter was the centre of the attraction as it marks her comeback who was main in the first two films. The filmmaking was compromised, I mean it was not 'found footage' style movie as should have been. Because where this story set in does not demand such kind of cinematographical portrayal. Also avoids the dark atmosphere that used to scare us, especially the night vision screenplay was critical in the earlier two films to creep out the viewers. The title for this installment was 'Apocalypse', but that does not make any sense what they show in the exit scene. Should have called it 'Zombie Ship' like 'Ghost Ship'. I feel it is worth a watch, only to keep updated the [Rec] film series, because if they make a phenomenal 5th movie, we don't have to go back to 4th for continuation. 6/10
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Useful Links
More with Manuela Velasco
View full filmographyPart of the [REC] Collection
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise![[REC]⁴ Apocalypse poster](https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/w500/nlSSZNESHkY1iPzYnpcRvYUr7Mz.jpg)


![[REC]³ Genesis movie poster - movieMx [REC]³ Genesis (2012) movie poster](https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/tI1534q0Up7PBcLdXdFerLmIXn3.jpg)
![[REC]² movie poster - movieMx [REC]² (2009) movie poster](https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/4JG5WKfIGD6r7hdbqJVr2WKIxEe.jpg)





