Performance & Direction: Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire Review
Last updated: February 5, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire (2006) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 7.0/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Documentary.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire features a noteworthy lineup led by Kae Bahar .
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire
Quick Plot Summary: Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire
Ending Breakdown: Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes with clear resolution of its central conflicts, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Main characters complete meaningful transformations, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the documentary themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Documentaries films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of the cast or director
- Want solid genre entertainment
Top Cast: Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire
All Cast & Crew →
Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire Parents Guide & Age Rating
2006 AdvisoryWondering about Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire is 90 minutes (1h 30m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 7.0/10, and global performance metrics, Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 2006 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire worth watching?
Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies. It has a verified rating of 7/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire?
The total duration of Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire is 90 minutes, which is approximately 1h 30m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire
How Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Return to Kirkuk: A Year in the Fire
No reviews found for this filter.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.








