Is Rings Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Rings is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Rings is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Rings is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2017, Rings emerges as a significant entry in the Horror domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Julia becomes worried about her boyfriend Holt when he explores the dark urban legend of a mysterious videotape said to kill the watcher seven days after viewing. Unlike standard genre fare, Rings attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Rings features a noteworthy lineup led by Matilda Lutz . Supported by the likes of Alex Roe and Johnny Galecki , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Rings (2017) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Rings is a Horror film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The horror unfolds through carefully crafted atmosphere and escalating dread. Julia becomes worried about her boyfriend Holt when he explores the dark urban legend of a mysterious videotape said to kill the watcher seven days after viewing. She sacrifices herself to save her boyfriend and in doing so makes a horrifying discovery: there is a "movie within the movie" that no one has ever seen before. The film uses both psychological terror and visceral scares, building tension through what's unseen as much as what's shown. The pacing allows for breathing room between scares, making each frightening moment more effective.
Ending Breakdown: Rings attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Rings reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $25.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $83.1M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Rings is $25.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Apple TV
Zee5
Amazon Video
Apple TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5/10, and global collection metrics, Rings stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2017 cinematic year.
Rings has received mixed reviews with a 5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Rings is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Horror movies, but read reviews first.
Rings may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
An interesting play up of the _Ring_ mythology, but not a great horror on its own merits. Also! The trailer for _Rings_ makes it appear as if the movie is about one thing. As it turns out, that one thing takes place entirely in the last 90 seconds of the film. _Final rating:★★ - Definitely not for me, but I sort of get the appeal._
**Samara takes a back seat to, um, I can't really remember what exactly.** 2017 version of the franchise adds digital files but conveniently forgets about the internet in an unnecessary continuation. Seriously, not one of the students would have tried to go viral by uploading the video to youtube or vimeo. The story takes a huge detour in what seems like it is supposed to be a fresh take on the franchise, but it just ends up treading water until the inevitable outcome. Samara the creeping kubuki dancer dead girl is barely in it, and that is a real shame. 4/10 seems mean so I gave it a 5/10, simply because even though it is a bit boring and not really scary, it is not a terribly made film. Just not very interesting.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise