Is Robbery Under Arms Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Robbery Under Arms is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Western movies.
It features a runtime of 141 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Robbery Under Arms is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.4/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Western, History genre.
Answer: Yes, Robbery Under Arms is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Western movies.
It features a runtime of 141 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1985, Robbery Under Arms emerges as a significant entry in the Western, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Fourth adaptation and first made for television of the classic Australian bushranger novel "Robbery Under Arms" by Rolf Boldrewood. Unlike standard genre fare, Robbery Under Arms attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Western is often anchored by its ensemble, and Robbery Under Arms features a noteworthy lineup led by Sam Neill . Supported by the likes of Steven Vidler and Christopher Cummins , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Robbery Under Arms (1985) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.4/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Robbery Under Arms is a Western, History film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Robbery Under Arms concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to western resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Robbery Under Arms reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Robbery Under Arms draws heavily from documented historical records. As a western, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Robbery Under Arms adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:






Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.4/10, and global collection metrics, Robbery Under Arms stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1985 cinematic year.
Robbery Under Arms has received mixed reviews with a 6.4/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Robbery Under Arms is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Western, History movies, but read reviews first.
Robbery Under Arms may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
No reviews found for this filter.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.