Is Rollerball Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Rollerball is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 125 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Rollerball is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Science Fiction, Action genre.
Answer: Yes, Rollerball is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 125 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1975, Rollerball emerges as a significant entry in the Science Fiction, Action domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of In a corporate-controlled future, an ultra-violent sport known as Rollerball represents the world, and one of its powerful athletes is out to defy those who want him out of the game. Unlike standard genre fare, Rollerball attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Science Fiction is often anchored by its ensemble, and Rollerball features a noteworthy lineup led by James Caan . Supported by the likes of John Houseman and Maud Adams , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Rollerball (1975) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.3/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Rollerball is a Science Fiction, Action film that explores futuristic concepts and technological possibilities while examining humanity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The film presents its narrative with careful attention to pacing and character development. In a corporate-controlled future, an ultra-violent sport known as Rollerball represents the world, and one of its powerful athletes is out to defy those who want him out of the game. The story unfolds naturally, allowing viewers to become invested in the outcome while maintaining engagement throughout.
Ending Breakdown: Rollerball concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to science fiction resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Rollerball reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $6.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $30.0M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Rollerball is $6.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










MGM Plus Amazon Channel
Apple TV
Amazon Video
Apple TVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.3/10, and global collection metrics, Rollerball stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1975 cinematic year.
Rollerball has received mixed reviews with a 6.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Rollerball is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Science Fiction, Action movies, but read reviews first.
Rollerball is currently available for streaming on MGM Plus Amazon Channel. You can also check for it on platforms like MGM Plus Amazon Channel depending on your region.
2018… Norman Jewison and William Harrison expand Harrison’s short story into a full length feature film, with great results. Story takes place in 2018 and the world is a global corporate state, a hegemony of six ruling cartels. There are no wars, poverty and etc, so the cartels provide the antidote to pent up frustrations with Rollerball, a bloodthirsty arena sport where no quarter is given or taken. But when the sports number one star, Jonathan E, becomes a free spirit and too big for the sport, the corporations aim to retire him… Headed by a superb James Caan as Jonathan, the performances are from the high end, the photography superb and the action during the games themselves is beautifully choreographed. The use of classical music to run concurrent with the themes in the narrative is smartly rendered to the tricksy plot, while the writing is sharp and deserving of the utmost attention from the viewer. It’s folly to suggest that when the film is away from the Rollerball ring it sags a touch, so patience is required and a respect of literate posturing is also expected to get the most out of it. A deft crafted dystopian sci-fier with literate smarts and lusty blood letting. 7.5/10
"Rollerball" is a violent, quickly paced and ruthless sport and "Jonathan E" (James Caan) is it's acclaimed hero. Dominant and popular, the crowd love him - but his boss "Bartholomew" (John Houseman) tells him it's time to retire. Their world is run by big corporations and these are not to be readily defied - but "Jonathan" isn't going to play ball. He is not going to sacrifice his fame, fortune and adulation without exacting some conditions of his own. One of which is that he be reunited by his wife (Maud Adams) who was apparently "reallocated" at the behest of another company bigwig. He also tries to find out just who is behind his dismissal - and why, and luckily has the help of "Cletus" (Moses Gunn) on that particular quest as his options narrow and "Bartholomew" becomes ever so slightly more menacing. The action scenes with the ball and skaters racing around the track is quite scintillating to watch with intense photography and plenty of high-speed tumbles, but the rest of it is all sort of "Logan's Run" with an Houseman who really only knew how to play one role. That worked well in the "Paper Chase" (1973) but here, it's just a bit underwhelming. Caan puts his heart and soul into the story, but there are too many holes in that to resonate beyond the obvious and rather undercooked swipe at a sterile authoritarianism that reminds us of the Nero and the Coliseum style of entertainment for the obedient (or else!) masses. It's fine - but nothing more.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.