Performance & Direction: Roommates Review
Last updated: January 20, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Roommates (1994) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 4.1/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Drama.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Roommates features a noteworthy lineup led by Randy Quaid . Supported by the likes of Eric Stoltz and Elizabeth Peña , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Roommates (1994) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.1/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: Roommates
Quick Plot Summary: Roommates is a Drama, TV Movie film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through detailed character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Roommates
Ending Breakdown: Roommates attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the drama themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Roommates reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Roommates?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Drama films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Roommates
All Cast & Crew →







Where to Watch Roommates Online?
Streaming HubRoommates Parents Guide & Age Rating
1994 AdvisoryWondering about Roommates age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Roommates is 100 minutes (1h 40m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.1/10, and global collection metrics, Roommates stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1994 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Roommates worth watching?
Roommates is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies. It has a verified rating of 4.1/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Roommates parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Roommates identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Roommates?
The total duration of Roommates is 100 minutes, which is approximately 1h 40m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Roommates
How Roommates Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Roommates
I reckon Randy Quaid hits the nail on the head quite well here as his frequently boozed-up but always bigoted “Flynn” finds himself sharing a flat with “Bill” (Eric Stoltz). This latter lad is an erudite and dapper young man who is suffering from AIDS and who earns nothing but disdain from his new room-mate. “Flynn” isn’t without his own demons, though, and despite the best efforts of his long-suffering father (Charles Durning) is a man with his own self-destructive streak. What chance they can ever even tolerate each other, much less anything else? Well, on that front it’s fairly clear from the outset what is going to happen. That’s not so important here, though. It’s the almost visceral effort from Quaid that raises the eyebrows as he really does deliver quite a remarkably convincing performance as an odious and inconsiderate man. Stoltz is far more understated with his “Bill” but that works just as well as a parry to the emotional turmoil emanating from his barely tolerable new companion. Durning and Elizabeth Peña also hold the fort well as they serve as foils for the excesses of one and the decline of another, and they also help to restrain the more sentimental elements that are often just a bit too close. Though made a good ten years after the worst of the AIDS hysteria, it still shines quite a light on the prevalent levels of ignorance that thrived even in the early 1990s; on the irrational hatred that engendered and with the subtle but effective use of dark humour now and again, it tells us a very human and touching story in a manner that is as engaging as it can be exasperating. Quite possibly Quaid’s best effort, but keep the tissues handy.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.









