Is Rough Night in Jericho Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Rough Night in Jericho is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Romance movies.
It features a runtime of 104 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Rough Night in Jericho is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Romance, Western genre.
Answer: Yes, Rough Night in Jericho is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Romance movies.
It features a runtime of 104 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1967, Rough Night in Jericho emerges as a significant entry in the Romance, Western domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of The only business in the Wild West town of Jericho that corrupt sheriff Alex Flood doesn't control behind the scenes is the stagecoach owned by tough-willed widow Molly Lang and her right-hand man, Hickman. Unlike standard genre fare, Rough Night in Jericho attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Romance is often anchored by its ensemble, and Rough Night in Jericho features a noteworthy lineup led by Dean Martin . Supported by the likes of George Peppard and Jean Simmons , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Rough Night in Jericho (1967) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Rough Night in Jericho is a Romance, Western film that explores the complexities of love and relationships with emotional depth and authenticity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Rough Night in Jericho concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to romance resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Rough Night in Jericho reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $1.8M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |








Starz Apple TV Channel
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.6/10, and global collection metrics, Rough Night in Jericho stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1967 cinematic year.
Rough Night in Jericho has received mixed reviews with a 6.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Rough Night in Jericho is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Romance, Western movies, but read reviews first.
Rough Night in Jericho is currently available for streaming on Starz Apple TV Channel. You can also check for it on platforms like Starz Apple TV Channel depending on your region.
**_A professional figures out a way to cut down the odds before making a move_** An ex-lawman from Santa Fe and his ex-deputy (John McIntire and George Peppard) come to an Arizona town to assist the female owner of a stagecoach line (Jean Simmons), who happens to be persecuted by the town’s venal mogul, also an ex-lawman (Dean Martin). Since the odds are against winning a tangle with this boss, Dolan (Peppard) is determined to move on. Is he yella or will he make a stand? “Rough Night in Jericho” (1967) comes in the spirit of “Rio Bravo” and “El Dorado,” just minus John Wayne. It’s mostly town-bound, but there are more than enough scenic sequences shot in the Southwest wilderness (cited below). The emphasis is human interest, which effectively draws you into the lives of the characters at play. A minor example is when a certain man is humiliated and written off as a coward, but he’s later given a chance to prove his mettle. A better example is how Flood (Martin) and Dolan are fleshed out with several interesting dialogues. You just know they’re gonna have a showdown. There’s also a great knock-down-drag-out fight between Dolan and Yarbrough (Slim Pickens). Impressive Steve Sandor plays a side character in this particular sequence as Flood’s henchman Simms; the role happened to be his cinematic debut. Regrettably, the ending needed tightened up and the flick is strapped with a professional-but-unfitting score that’s unmemorable. It needed a composition along the lines of, say, “Bandolero!” or “Duel at Diablo.” Yet this isn’t a deal-breaker and arguably adds a unique charm to the film. In any case, it’s superior to Martin’s “5 Card Stud,” but not quite on the level of his “Bandolero!” It runs 1 hour, 44 minutes, and was shot in Old Tucson, Arizona, with out-of-town stuff done in southern Utah at Glen Canyon, Kanab Canyon, Paria and the Gap, as well as Vermilion Cliffs and Colorado City in nearby Arizona. GRADE: B
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.