Is Run the Wild Fields Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Run the Wild Fields is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 101 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Run the Wild Fields is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.2/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, TV Movie genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Run the Wild Fields is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 101 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2000, Run the Wild Fields emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, TV Movie domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A gentle, pacifist drifter faces a town's patriotic wrath on the World War II era home front in this original drama. Unlike standard genre fare, Run the Wild Fields attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Run the Wild Fields features a noteworthy lineup led by Sean Patrick Flanery . Supported by the likes of Alexa PenaVega and Joanne Whalley , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Run the Wild Fields (2000) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.2/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Run the Wild Fields is a Drama, TV Movie film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Run the Wild Fields attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Run the Wild Fields reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:






CineverseAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.2/10, and global collection metrics, Run the Wild Fields stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2000 cinematic year.
Run the Wild Fields is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.2/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.2/10, Run the Wild Fields may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Run the Wild Fields is currently available for streaming on Cineverse. You can also check for it on platforms like Cineverse depending on your region.
**_Hidden gem about life in rural America in the last year of WW2_** A woman in North Carolina (Joanne Whalley) awaits the return of her husband from the Pacific, who’s missing in action. She hires a disreputable transient to work the farm (Sean Patrick Flanery) and he bonds with her 10 years-old daughter (Alexa PenaVega). “Run the Wild Fields” (2000) was based on a play and contains elements of films like “Of Mice and Men,” “Places in the Heart,” “The Man in the Moon” and “Lawn Dogs.” The story has room to breathe as it fleshes-out the characters and refuses to go over-the-top, which works for me. There is one cliched scene, but the flick makes up for it with an unexpected turn. It runs 1 hour, 41 minutes, and was shot north of Toronto in Whitchurch-Stouffville. GRADE: A-
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.