Is Safari Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Safari is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Safari is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.6/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Adventure genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Safari is likely a skip if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1956, Safari emerges as a significant entry in the Adventure domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Wealthy eccentric Sir Vincent Brampton and his fiancée Linda Latham hire Ken Duffield to lead them on a jungle hunt. Unlike standard genre fare, Safari attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Adventure is often anchored by its ensemble, and Safari features a noteworthy lineup led by Victor Mature . Supported by the likes of Janet Leigh and John Justin , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Safari (1956) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.6/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Safari is a Adventure film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Safari attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to adventure resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Safari reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:








fuboTVAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.6/10, and global collection metrics, Safari stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1956 cinematic year.
Safari has received mixed reviews with a 5.6/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Safari is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Adventure movies, but read reviews first.
Safari is currently available for streaming on fuboTV. You can also check for it on platforms like fuboTV depending on your region.
'On a safari, blow your horn... Must stay alert from dusk til dawn...' It's actually quite apt that I'm watching this now just as the King returns from Kenya where apologies for the colonial treatment of the Mau Mau were top of the reconciliation agenda. In this jungle adventure, it's Victor Mature's "Duffield" who is out to avenge a murderous attack by these self same freedom fighters on his family. The authorities want him out of the way, but the influential "Sir Vincent" (Roland Culver) arrives on the scene bent on killing a legendary lion and so arranges for "Duffield" to be his guide. The latter man sees a chance for retribution and is also intrigued by "Linda" (Janet Leigh) who is engaged to the trip's patron. As he's a bit of a pompous bully, nobody is quite sure why. Anyway, the adventures ensue with snakes, crocodiles, lions and some good old human treachery before an ending that delivers just desserts all round. It's of it's day this, so some of the language and imagery might offend, as might Mature's really rather wooden acting but if you are a fan of the boy's own style of action movie then this isn't the worst. Might have been more fun if the man and the rhino went head to head without one having the benefit of a gun!
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.