Is Saw Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Saw is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 103 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Saw is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.4/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the Horror, Mystery, Crime genre.
Answer: Yes, Saw is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 103 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2004, Saw emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Mystery, Crime domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Two men wake up to find themselves shackled in a grimy, abandoned bathroom. Unlike standard genre fare, Saw attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a refreshing take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Saw features a noteworthy lineup led by Tobin Bell . Supported by the likes of Cary Elwes and Leigh Whannell , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Saw (2004) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.4/10, it stands as a mandatory watch for any serious cinema lover.
Quick Plot Summary: Saw is a Horror, Mystery, Crime film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The horror unfolds through carefully crafted atmosphere and escalating dread. Two men wake up to find themselves shackled in a grimy, abandoned bathroom. As they struggle to comprehend their predicament, they discover a disturbing tape left behind by the sadistic mastermind known as Jigsaw. With a chilling voice and cryptic instructions, Jigsaw informs them that they must partake in a gruesome game in order to secure their freedom. The film uses both psychological terror and visceral scares, building tension through what's unseen as much as what's shown. The pacing allows for breathing room between scares, making each frightening moment more effective.
Beneath the scares lies commentary on deeper fears—loss of control, the unknown, or societal anxieties manifested as literal monsters.
Ending Breakdown: Saw resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to horror resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Saw reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Saw incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a horror, mystery, crime film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film balances historical fidelity with cinematic storytelling. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
The production demonstrates respect for its source material, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Saw adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $1.2M |
| Worldwide Gross | $104.0M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
The estimated production budget for Saw is $1.2M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTubeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7.4/10, and global collection metrics, Saw stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2004 cinematic year.
Saw is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7.4/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Horror, Mystery, Crime movies.
Yes, Saw is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of Horror, Mystery, Crime cinema.
Saw may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Though I tend to go for both older films (those made before 1970) and especially so when it comes to the horror/thriller genre, I saw parts 3 and 5 upon theatrical release (yes, I know it's really not right to see film series out of sequence but I simply don't care) and they were intriguing and decent, don't ask me why. Now that I both date a horror film aficionado and my 13-year-old son himself is one as well, I have decided to check out the contemporarily well-received original (I may decide now to see the entire series, and in order, but really who's to say?). Instantly, such trusted, bankable actors as Cary Elwes and Danny Glover give it credibility, just as Bette Davis and Joan Crawford gave such films as 'What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?' way back in days gone by. This was much better than I felt parts 3 and 5 were, by the way.
With no obvious connection between them, two men awaken to find themselves chained to the plumbing at opposite ends of a room. "Adam" (Leigh Whannell) is a photographer, the other is "Lawrence" (Cary Elwes), a doctor. Each have a micro-tape in their pocket and the only tape player in the room is nestled neatly in the hands of a corpse situated on the centre of the floor. A bit of ingenuity is needed to obtain the kit to play the tape and hopefully get some clue as to why there are there. Suffice to say that they do not like what they hear, and with the clock ticking they will have to learn to trust each other whilst having quite a sword of Damocles hanging over their heads. Meantime, the police (Danny Glover) are interviewing a woman who might have managed to escape from a similarly orchestrated predicament. Might there be any way that she could help track down this devious mastermind who doesn't ever actually do any of his own killing - he just manipulates with astonishing purpose. Elwes and Whannell (who also wrote this) both deliver really quite strongly here as does their claustrophobic and distinctly unsanitary prison environment as the story tells us via contemporaneous and flashback imagery a little of their stories and of just why they have attracted the attention of this vengeful "jigsaw killer". It's not especially graphic, this film, though there is a fair smattering of gore - it's the psychology that helps it to deliver better. There's always that element of what might we do to survive, or - maybe more apposite - what might we be prepared to do to others. The writing also helps it along with the exasperation of all well exemplified without just resorting to loud voices and expletives. In the end, I found that I did actually care what happened to these men - but with the clock against them, what are their chances? It's tense and compelling and reminded me a little of "Se7en" (1995).
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise