Is Shooting Fish Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Shooting Fish is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 109 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Shooting Fish is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime, Comedy, Romance genre.
Answer: Yes, Shooting Fish is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 109 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1997, Shooting Fish emerges as a significant entry in the Crime, Comedy, Romance domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Two con artists hire an unwitting medical-school student as a secretary for their latest scam. Unlike standard genre fare, Shooting Fish attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Crime is often anchored by its ensemble, and Shooting Fish features a noteworthy lineup led by Dan Futterman . Supported by the likes of Stuart Townsend and Kate Beckinsale , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Shooting Fish (1997) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.3/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Shooting Fish is a Crime, Comedy, Romance film that delves into the criminal underworld with gritty realism and moral complexity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Shooting Fish concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to crime resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Shooting Fish reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Shooting Fish incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a crime, comedy, romance film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Shooting Fish adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $3.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $302.2K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Shooting Fish is $3.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.







fuboTV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.3/10, and global collection metrics, Shooting Fish stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1997 cinematic year.
Shooting Fish has received mixed reviews with a 6.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Shooting Fish is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Crime, Comedy, Romance movies, but read reviews first.
Shooting Fish is currently available for streaming on fuboTV. You can also check for it on platforms like fuboTV depending on your region.
From opposite sides of the Pond, but with a similarly parent-free upbringing, “Jez” (Stuart Townsend) and “Dylan” (Dan Futterman) have crafted themselves quite a nifty little grifting business. The former is a bit of a tech whizz, the latter could sell sand in the desert and together, from their home in a disused London gasometer, they have a target of raising £2 millions so they can buy a stately home - the kind the poverty-stricken “Dylan” dreamt of when he was a boy. It’s their latest wheeze that ropes in posh gal "Georgie” (Kate Beckinsale) and leads to two becoming three as their enterprise enters the home straight. Then, though, they fall foul of one of their more savvy marks, end up in jail and discover that Her Majesty is not only going to keep them for three months, but that she’s also fallen out of love with her visage on a £50 note. These are all to be withdrawn before the boys are set free. What to do? Meantime, “Georgie” is about to marry the venal “Roger” (Dominic Mafham) whilst trying to keep her late father’s charitable foundation afloat - a matter particularly close to her heart as her younger brother has Downs Syndrome and lives with his friends in a converted wing of their family home that is now required by the taxman. Now she is as honest as the day is long, but when needs must might she be tempted to help the boys to save their fortune - but on her own terms? It does blow hot and cold a little, especially towards the end, but there’s an engaging chemistry on display here between the two lads and between Townsend and Beckinsale and their antics as they sell sixth generation computer chips, adeptly recycle loft insulation and come up with quite an innovative jockey’s aid all made me smile. The soundtrack, with loads of “Space” and their “Beautiful Neighourhood”, and some quite entertaining writing all made this a film that I really quite enjoyed. A simple story of the urchins that turned.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.