Is Sleepless Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Sleepless is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 95 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Sleepless is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Crime, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Sleepless is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 95 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2017, Sleepless emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Crime, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Undercover Las Vegas police officer Vincent Downs, who has a lot of enemies, is caught in a high stakes web of corrupt cops and the mob-controlled casino underground. Unlike standard genre fare, Sleepless attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Sleepless features a noteworthy lineup led by Jamie Foxx . Supported by the likes of Michelle Monaghan and Dermot Mulroney , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Sleepless (2017) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Sleepless is a Action, Crime, Thriller film that delivers high-octane sequences and adrenaline-pumping confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The narrative structure follows a classic action blueprint: establish the protagonist's world, introduce a formidable antagonist, and escalate the stakes through increasingly intense confrontations. Undercover Las Vegas police officer Vincent Downs, who has a lot of enemies, is caught in a high stakes web of corrupt cops and the mob-controlled casino underground. When a heist goes wrong, a crew of homicidal gangsters kidnap Downs’ teenage son T. In one sleepless night, Downs will have to rescue his son, evade an internal affairs investigation, and bring the kidnappers to justice. The film balances spectacular set pieces with character moments, ensuring the action serves the story rather than overwhelming it.
Ending Breakdown: Sleepless attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Sleepless reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Sleepless incorporates elements from real criminal cases. As a action, crime, thriller film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, focusing on emotional truth over strict chronology.
Accuracy Assessment: Sleepless adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $30.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $32.5M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Sleepless is $30.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Sony Liv
VI movies and tv
Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.9/10, and global collection metrics, Sleepless stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2017 cinematic year.
Sleepless has received mixed reviews with a 5.9/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Sleepless is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Action, Crime, Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
Sleepless is currently available for streaming on Sony Liv. You can also check for it on platforms like Sony Liv, VI movies and tv depending on your region.
**A night of twist and turn events.** Maybe if you haven't seen the original, you will enjoy it, particularly if you like a thrilling clash between the cops and gangsters. For me this is the third version from the last three consecutive years. After the original French film based on the same name of the book, followed by the Kollywood remake 'Thoongavanam'. The second film was not bad, considering the way it was made to the Indian standards. They did not change much, but in this one the initial parts were almost the same and the following developments were too much. I mean literally they turned it into twice thriller with tight action sequences. Their main idea was to leave the open conclusion for a possible sequel. Which was really too intentional that not everybody would be happy with, for like those who liked the previous versions. The actors were good, but Michelle Monaghan was the best among. Unlike the same characters from other versions, I don't know how they turned Monaghan's role so powerful. That's the negative, as the film Jamie Foxx in the lead. Otherwise, as a neutral, this is not a bad remake. The Immigrant joke was trimmed off, since today's US is not in favour of such comedies in films. And many events, especially film scenes were accelerated. So the camera moves one place to another in a quick succession unlike other versions. Yeah, these changes were needed, since the film was not a fresh piece of work or even first remake. But like I said too muchness spoiled the party. Even though one time watchable film. _6/10_
A far cry from the worst film of the year, but it does seem surprising that someone as talented as Jamie Foxx would bother with something this overpoweringly generic. _Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product._
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.