Is Sliver Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Sliver is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 107 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Sliver is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, Thriller genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Sliver is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 107 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1993, Sliver emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A woman moves into a Manhattan apartment, where she learns that the previous tenant's life ended under mysterious circumstances. Unlike standard genre fare, Sliver attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Sliver features a noteworthy lineup led by Sharon Stone . Supported by the likes of William Baldwin and Tom Berenger , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Sliver (1993) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Sliver is a Drama, Thriller film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
This character-driven narrative explores the internal and external conflicts that define the human experience. A woman moves into a Manhattan apartment, where she learns that the previous tenant's life ended under mysterious circumstances. The screenplay takes time to develop its characters, allowing audiences to connect emotionally with their struggles and triumphs. Each scene builds upon the last, creating a cumulative emotional impact.
Ending Breakdown: Sliver attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Sliver reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $40.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $116.3M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Sliver is $40.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.5/10, and global collection metrics, Sliver stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1993 cinematic year.
Sliver has received mixed reviews with a 5.5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Sliver is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
Sliver may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Some steamy scenes I expect from a 90s erotic thriller and for the most part was entertaining if not ridiculous premise, though acting wise Sharon Stone was fine though. Nothing really memorable compared with Basic Instinct, Fatal Attraction or Wild Things, the latter the best of trashy thrillers. Still, never found myself bored and a decent twist at the end, so there's that. **2.75/5**
After a surprisingly short wait, successful publishing executive “Carly” (Sharon Stone) finds herself able to move into an apartment on the twentieth floor of a plush Manhattan block. Initially, her neighbours remark on how similar she looks to it’s previous occupant - a woman who leapt from the balcony! She’s made of stronger stuff, though, and sets no store by superstition until she meets “Lansford” (Tom Berenger) who starts to fill her head with conspiracy theories about “Zeke” (William Baldwin) - a slickly creepy fellow whom we know has an array of illicit surveillance equipment dotted about the building and who is no respecter of anyone’s privacy. Yet another suspicious death brings the cops (CCH Pounder) to the building and now “Carly” has to face up to the fact that quite possibly her enigmatic new lover might be up to no good! The question for her, though, is whom - if anyone - can she trust? Stone does bring a bit of sexiness to her role, but otherwise this is an unremarkable meander of a film with little to engage us. Baldwin tries to imbue his high-tech character with some sleaziness, but that just ends up more like wheeziness and the whole murder mystery is seriously and quite lazily undercooked - relying on the hidden cameras to present a sense of the creepily prurient and a few sterile sex scenes. Remote controls feature quite often here, and perhaps that’s the most useful piece of kit in our armoury when watching it?
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.


