Spider Baby
Performance & Direction: Spider Baby Review
Last updated: January 24, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Spider Baby (1967) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 6.9/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Comedy.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Spider Baby features a noteworthy lineup led by Lon Chaney Jr. . Supported by the likes of Carol Ohmart and Quinn K. Redeker , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Spider Baby (1967) is generally positive. With an audience rating of 6.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: Spider Baby
Quick Plot Summary: Spider Baby is a Comedy, Horror film that brings laughter through sharp writing and comedic timing, providing amusement while touching on deeper societal themes. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Spider Baby
Ending Breakdown: Spider Baby concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the comedy themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Spider Baby reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Spider Baby?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Comedy films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of the cast or director
- Want some laughs and light entertainment
Box Office Collection: Spider Baby
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $65.0K |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
Spider Baby Budget
The estimated production budget for Spider Baby is $65.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Top Cast: Spider Baby
All Cast & Crew →








Where to Watch Spider Baby Online?
Streaming HubSpider Baby Parents Guide & Age Rating
1967 AdvisoryWondering about Spider Baby age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Spider Baby is 84 minutes (1h 24m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 6.9/10, and global performance metrics, Spider Baby is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 1967 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Spider Baby worth watching?
Spider Baby is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies. It has a verified rating of 6.9/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Spider Baby parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Spider Baby identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Spider Baby?
The total duration of Spider Baby is 84 minutes, which is approximately 1h 24m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Spider Baby
How Spider Baby Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Spider Baby
A fun romp. This movie feels like it is wedged between old school horror, and more recent exploitation films. Stylistically, it feels 50s, yet subject matter is more 70s exploitation. I liked it, but I will watch a lot of garbage. Give it a try. Young Sid Haig as a bonus.
Picture a ramshackle house (like the one the "Waltons" lived in) and then imagine it populated by two sisters and a brother who progress ok until their early teens, then they start to regress - with varying degrees of maniacal behaviour. Is this dangerous? Well we need only ask poor old Mantan Moreland who never faced such dangers with "Charlie Chan" as he does in the opening scenes trying to deliver a letter to the house and... well... it's the last delivery he will ever make! Their only controlling influence is their chauffeur "Bruno" (Lon Chaney Jr.) but even he has his hands full when some grasping cousins - and their lawyer - decide to come visit and claim their inheritance. Given the state of the place, I'd have run a mile but they cling on and are soon beginning to regret their perseverance! It's fun, this. It makes no effort to assess or explain the mental illness that prevails amongst the offspring - aside from suggesting that it could be quite plausible for their mother, father and dog to all have been the same being! The acting itself is pretty average, the writing delivers little by way of subtlety or mystery and we are left with a series of slightly repetitive spoof-horror scenarios that wear thin after a while. It's not with humour - intended or otherwise - and it moves along quite well for 80 minutes but sadly not a film I think I'd ever bother to watch again.
**_“It’s a madhouse, a madhouse!”_** This was shot at the end of summer, 1964, but not released until over three years later due to the producers going bankrupt. Its full title is “Spider Baby or, The Maddest Story Ever Told,” which is reminiscent of other oddball, overlong titles in the ’60s, such as "The Incredibly Strange Creatures ...Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies!!?" This isn’t as entertaining and it’s strapped by B&W photography but, like that one, it’s really quirky, hammy horror, rather than a comedy. Both came in the 'B' tradition of "The Brain That Wouldn't Die,” mixed with the slasher bits of "Psycho." Rob Zombie was obviously influenced by it for his “House of 1000 Corpses.” While Lon Chaney Jr in his old age and a young Sid Haig are notable, the real highlight is the female cast. Guys tend to gush over petite brunette Jill Banner as Virginia, who happened to be 17 during shooting and would turn 18 a couple of months later. She unfortunately died prematurely in 1982 at the age of 35 due to a vehicular accident involving a drunk truck driver on an off-ramp of Ventura Freeway. Interestingly, she was working for Marlon Brando at the time, developing scripts and what have you. While she certainly has her appeal, her character is so dim-witted and psycho, she’s a turn-off (for me, anyway). I prefer Carol Ohmart as Emily, who has a few stunning scenes à la “Horror Hotel,” aka “The City of the Dead.” It runs 1 hour, 21 minutes, and was shot at Smith Estate in Highland Park and other parts of Los Angeles, such as Chatsworth and Mandeville Canyon, with studio work done in Glendale. GRADE: B-
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.









