Is Summer Interlude Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Summer Interlude is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Summer Interlude is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.4/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the Drama, Romance genre.
Answer: Yes, Summer Interlude is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1951, Summer Interlude emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, Romance domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of During a brief summer vacation, a lonely woman recalls her first love thirteen years earlier. Unlike standard genre fare, Summer Interlude attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a refreshing take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Summer Interlude features a noteworthy lineup led by Maj-Britt Nilsson . Supported by the likes of Birger Malmsten and Alf Kjellin , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Summer Interlude (1951) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.4/10, it stands as a mandatory watch for any serious cinema lover.
Quick Plot Summary: Summer Interlude is a Drama, Romance film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Summer Interlude resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Summer Interlude reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:










Criterion Channel
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7.4/10, and global collection metrics, Summer Interlude stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1951 cinematic year.
Summer Interlude is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7.4/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Drama, Romance movies.
Yes, Summer Interlude is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of Drama, Romance cinema.
Summer Interlude is currently available for streaming on Criterion Channel. You can also check for it on platforms like Criterion Channel depending on your region.
For those who first discovered Ingmar Bergman's work through the internationally acclaimed masterpieces of the late 1950s, there can be a reluctance to go too far back in time before that. After all, weren't the Swedish director's earliest films journeyman efforts where he did not have much control over the filmmaking process, and he had not yet found his distinct style? I, at any rate, get a feeling like this from his 1952 picture "Summer with Monika". I was delighted however, to find that the even earlier "Summer Interlude" to be a strong film. While shot in 1950, it fully anticipates Bergman's mature career. As the film opens we are introduced to Marie (Maj-Britt Nilsson), a successful ballerina in Stockholm who is however visibly unsatisfied and emotionally distant from those around her. As she takes a ferry out to the Stockholm archipelago, the film switches into flashback mode and we learn the whole story of what made her what she is. Thirteen years before, while still a student and on summer holiday at the family cottage, she had a brief fling with Henrik (Birger Malmsten). This was a romantic -- and very nearly sexual -- awakening for them both, and Bergman depicts it with all the wistfulness of an adult looking back on the heady days of youth, just like the film's protagonist. Yet summer does not last forever, and events move in a direction that prevents the two from staying together. As I said, this is already mature Bergman in some of its concerns: belief in God and dissatisfaction at God's silence, interpersonal relationships and the feeling that people wear a mask when dealing with others, and of course the fleeting nature of the bright and warm Nordic summer. I will not however call this one of Bergman's very greatest films. The ending, after we return to the present day from the flashback, feels wrong somehow, the rhythm suddenly jarring and Bergman's point inchoate. Yet overall this is a satisfying picture to sit through, and there are many details to appreciate. Nilsson's acting is ultra-coquettish, and the sexual frankness on display here is surprising; this is in fact more daring than "Summer with Monika", a film with a wider such reputation internationally. The supporting roles by Georg Funkquist and Renée Björling as middle-aged friends of Marie's family lend the film more depth; their failed marriage is a moving counterpoint to the heady passion of the young lovers.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.