Is Survivor Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Survivor is likely a skip if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 93 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Survivor is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.4/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Science Fiction, Action, Fantasy genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Survivor is likely a skip if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 93 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2014, Survivor emerges as a significant entry in the Science Fiction, Action, Fantasy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of During their search for a habitable planet the last living humans crash-land on a barren world, inhabited by bloodthirsty aliens and mysterious post-apocalyptic warriors. Unlike standard genre fare, Survivor attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Science Fiction is often anchored by its ensemble, and Survivor features a noteworthy lineup led by Danielle Chuchran . Supported by the likes of Kevin Sorbo and Rocky Myers , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Survivor (2014) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.4/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: Survivor is a Science Fiction, Action, Fantasy film that explores futuristic concepts and technological possibilities while examining humanity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: Survivor attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to science fiction resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of Survivor reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:








Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTubeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.4/10, and global collection metrics, Survivor stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2014 cinematic year.
Survivor is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.4/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.4/10, Survivor may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Survivor may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
**_A beautiful blonde and scenic Utah locations, but bad writing and contrived dynamics_** After crashlanding on a planet, a young woman (Danielle C. Ryan) has to face two forms of humanoid threats to make it to her injured captain (Kevin Sorbo) and possible escape. "Survivor" (2014) mixes the first act of the original “Planet of the Apes” with The Land of the Lost TV series (the Sleestak and caves), plus maybe a little “The Descent.” The rocky desert locations are outstanding (cited below) and Danielle is stunning with her long mane and fit body, but too much of the runtime focuses on her running around the landscapes while Sorbo’s role is basically limited to lying around with a broken leg. Worse, there are too many glaringly posed shots and contrived choreographies. Plus, the ‘girl power’ element is laid on too thick, like when the heroine easily beats six athletic male antagonists. Why Sure! On top of all this is lousy writing, such as when the truth about the planet is revealed. I can’t blame the actors for the questionable acting, even the blubbering Weston (Blake Webb); the problem is the bad script. If you want to see this type of Sci-Fi adventure done right on a TV budget, check out “The Lost Future” from 2010. It’s great; this one’s just eye-rolling. It runs 1 hour, 33 minutes, and was shot in two areas of Utah. In the southeast: St. George, Sand Hollow Reservoir and Snow Canyon State Park; in the north: Starvation State Park and Provo to the west of there, along with South Fork Park, which is north of Provo. GRADE: C-/D+
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.