Performance & Direction: Sweet Review
Last updated: January 21, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Sweet (2001) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 7.0/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Comedy.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Sweet features a noteworthy lineup led by Noel Fielding . Supported by the likes of Julian Barratt and Toby Walton , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of Sweet (2001) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Story & Plot Summary: Sweet
Quick Plot Summary: Sweet is a Comedy film that brings laughter through sharp writing and comedic timing, providing amusement while touching on deeper societal themes. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Sweet
Ending Breakdown: Sweet resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes with clear resolution of its central conflicts, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Main characters complete meaningful transformations, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the comedy themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Sweet reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Sweet?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Comedy films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of the cast or director
- Want some laughs and light entertainment
Top Cast: Sweet
All Cast & Crew →Sweet Parents Guide & Age Rating
2001 AdvisoryWondering about Sweet age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Sweet is 10 minutes (10m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7/10, and global collection metrics, Sweet stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2001 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Sweet worth watching?
Sweet is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies. It has a verified rating of 7/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Sweet parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Sweet identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Sweet?
The total duration of Sweet is 10 minutes, which is approximately 0h 10m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Sweet
How Sweet Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Sweet
“I even tried phone sex, but they were engaged.” This has a little of “Harvey” (1950) to it, only it’s not an invisible rabbit but an invisible girlfriend (“Poppy”) that becomes the apple of the eye of “Pete” (Noël Fielding). He has a particularly full relationship with this fictitious lass, until she declares over breakfast in a café one morning that she is pregnant. The shellshocked “Pete” doesn’t react so well, so they split up. Initially devastated and desperate to woo her back, he then encounters “Daisy” (Suzy Bloom) and soon they are at it like rabbits too, not that she seems overly impressed with his lengthy lovemaking! Then “Poppy” reappears on the scene and “Pete” thinks he can can have his cake and eat it, only for his best friend “Stitch” (Julian Barrett) to put a jealous spanner in the works that sees quite a change in the relationship dynamic of all concerned. Fielding is on good form here, his energy and comedy timing works well as this really quite ridiculous scenario plays out in a style akin to Marcel Marceau. There’s that scene over their sausage and eggs when he manages to have his chat with “Poppy” whilst two bemused ladies sit at an adjacent table - sipping their tea and thinking him deranged - that raises a smile and the remainder of this ten minutes flies by entertainingly as it exposes some of the fickleness of humankind with some quick-fired, quite witty, dialogue.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










