Performance & Direction: Tarzan and the Valley of Gold Review
Last updated: February 7, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Tarzan and the Valley of Gold (1966) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.2/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Action.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Tarzan and the Valley of Gold features a noteworthy lineup led by Mike Henry . Supported by the likes of David Opatoshu and Manuel Padilla Jr. , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Tarzan and the Valley of Gold
Quick Plot Summary: Tarzan and the Valley of Gold is a Action, Adventure film that delivers highly intense sequences and pulse-pounding confrontations that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: Tarzan and the Valley of Gold
Ending Breakdown: Tarzan and the Valley of Gold attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to action resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the action themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Tarzan and the Valley of Gold reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Tarzan and the Valley of Gold?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Action films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Tarzan and the Valley of Gold
All Cast & Crew →









Where to Watch Tarzan and the Valley of Gold Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Apple TV Store
Amazon Video🏷️ Buy on
Apple TV Store
Amazon VideoTarzan and the Valley of Gold Parents Guide & Age Rating
1966 AdvisoryWondering about Tarzan and the Valley of Gold age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Tarzan and the Valley of Gold is 90 minutes (1h 30m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.2/10, and global performance metrics, Tarzan and the Valley of Gold is classified as a AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1966 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Tarzan and the Valley of Gold worth watching?
Tarzan and the Valley of Gold is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies. It has a verified rating of 5.2/10 and stands as a AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Tarzan and the Valley of Gold parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Tarzan and the Valley of Gold identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Tarzan and the Valley of Gold?
The total duration of Tarzan and the Valley of Gold is 90 minutes, which is approximately 1h 30m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Tarzan and the Valley of Gold
How Tarzan and the Valley of Gold Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Tarzan and the Valley of Gold
_**Mike Henry plays the best Tarzan in this Bond-esque take on the ape man**_ The ape man travels to Mexico and tussles with an international criminal (David Opatoshu), who enjoys ridding his enemies in explosive ways. He kidnaps a boy whom he thinks will lead him to a lost city of gold. Don Megowan is on hand as the intimidating Mr. Train. "Tarzan and the Valley of Gold" (1966) has a lot of good elements. For starters, former NFL-player Mike Henry is arguably the best actor to play Tarzan ever, at least as far as looking/acting like Burroughs' character goes. Here Tarzan doesn't speak in monosyllables, like the Weissmuller films or early Gordon Scott ones. He's articulate, intelligent and noble. Released at the height of the mid-60's James Bond craze, this movie could've been called "The Man from A.F.R.I.C.A.," which is an actual line in the movie. It's akin to 007 in a loincloth with various friendly animals (a chimp, a lion and a jaguar). Speaking of which, it's amazing what you see Henry and the boy do with the latter two (the boy actually rides the lion!). Other positives include the last act's inclusion of the incredible Mesoamerican ruins of Teotihuacán in central Mexico, highlighted by the huge Pyramid of the Sun. Today, the sequence would've been done with cartoony CGI, but here it's all authentic locations and quite impressive. You might remember the stunning Nancy Kovack from the 1968 Star Trek episode "A Private Little War" where she played the flirtatious Nona. She also had a good role in 1963's "Jason and the Argonauts." Unfortunately, while she has some quality screen time, not enough is done with her. I've heard the argument that Tarzan belongs in mythical Africa not mythical central America, but creator Burroughs had Tarzan globetrotting a bit, particularly back-and-forth from Europe to Africa, but the story in one book -- "Tarzan and the Foreign Legion" -- takes place on the island of Sumatra and another -- "Tarzan and the Castaways" -- takes place on a Pacific island inhabited by the remnant of a lost Mayan civilization, which isn't far removed from what the ape man experiences here. One book (probably more) he's in the friggin' desert. Basically, as long as Tarzan's in action, fighting corruption and hanging out with nature & animals, it's Tarzan. All the above positives almost compel me to give "Tarzan and the Valley of Gold" a marginal thumbs up, but something holds it back. For one, there's a semi-goofy kiddie animal section in the second act, which seems incongruous with the serious air of the proceedings. I can live with this flaw, however. So what's the major problem? There's just something off with the script that prevents the movie from being compelling. The reason all the James Bond films of the 60s through mid-80s were hits is because the producers hired great writers who knew how to make a story flow and keep the movie entertaining. Not so here, but it's okay and worth catching if the positives trip your trigger. It runs 1 hour, 30 minutes, and was shot in Mexico. GRADE: C+
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Useful Links
More with Mike Henry
View full filmographyPart of the Tarzan (Mike Henry) Collection
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise








