That Darn Cat
That Darn Cat Review: Story, Cast, Rating & Final Verdict
Last updated: April 11, 2026
Movie Overview: That Darn Cat
| Movie | That Darn Cat |
| Release Year | 1997 |
| Director | Bob Spiers |
| Genre | Family / Comedy |
| Runtime | 89 minutes |
| Language | EN |
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is That Darn Cat (1997) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.0/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Family.
Cast & Character Study
The performances in That Darn Cat are led by Christina Ricci . The supporting cast, including Doug E. Doug and Dean Jones , provides the necessary layers to the central narrative.
movieMx Verdict: Is it Worth Your Time?
What Works in the Movie
While That Darn Cat does not fully realize its potential, it still contains moments that may appeal to viewers who enjoy Family films.
- Interesting concept or premise
- Some entertaining scenes
- Supporting cast delivers occasional highlights
What Doesn't Work
Despite its strengths, That Darn Cat has a few issues that may affect the overall viewing experience, particularly in terms of pacing and narrative consistency.
- Uneven pacing in certain parts of the film
- Some predictable plot developments
- May not appeal to audiences outside the Family fanbase
Story & Plot Summary: That Darn Cat
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1997, That Darn Cat is a Family, Comedy film directed by Bob Spiers. The narrative presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Christina Ricci.
Ending Explained: That Darn Cat
That Darn Cat Ending Explained: Directed by Bob Spiers, That Darn Cat attempts to bring together the film’s narrative threads. The ending highlights the core family themes developed throughout the film.
The conclusion reflects the central themes explored throughout the narrative, particularly in scenes involving Christina Ricci. The interpretation of the ending may vary among viewers.
Key Elements of the Ending
- Narrative Resolution: The story resolves its primary conflict while leaving room for interpretation.
- Character Development: Character motivations become clearer by the final scenes.
- Thematic Message: The ending reinforces the family themes introduced earlier in the film.
The final moments of That Darn Cat reflect the creative choices of the filmmakers and align with the tone of the narrative.
Who Should Watch That Darn Cat?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Family films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: That Darn Cat
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch That Darn Cat Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
VI movies and tvThat Darn Cat Parents Guide & Age Rating
1997 AdvisoryWondering about That Darn Cat age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of That Darn Cat is 89 minutes (1h 29m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.0/10, and global performance metrics, That Darn Cat is classified as a AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1997 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is That Darn Cat worth watching?
That Darn Cat is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Family movies. It has a verified rating of 5/10 and stands as a AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find That Darn Cat parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for That Darn Cat identifies it as PG. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of That Darn Cat?
The total duration of That Darn Cat is 89 minutes, which is approximately 1h 29m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked That Darn Cat
How That Darn Cat Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for That Darn Cat
That ending... I'm not sure if it's woeful or brilliant, I'm leaning towards the latter I gotta be honest. Hear me out. For most of my watch, I was expecting to give this a less than positive rating. It starts off decently before meandering towards its conclusion. When it gets there, though, it's absolutely bonkers. My feelings towards the final part switched completely, I initially found it stupid (which it probably is) but the last embers of it are so ridiculous that it's actually entertaining. Don't be fooled by the covers for this film, by the way. It looks like it's going to be a CGI cat but it isn't, a real cat is used for the vast majority as far as I could tell. Even on Disney+ it has the CG cover, which cheapens the film and would've turned me away - had I not been on this Disney marathon that I'm on. Very strange choice from the makers. At this point, it is worth noting I thoroughly enjoyed the 1965 original film; which is far, far superior to this remake. The cast in '65 are terrific, but the '97 cast list is one I actually rate. Dean Jones, to my surprise, appears in this one. He plays a different character completely, but it's cool to see him nevertheless. As for the newcomers onscreen, Christina Ricci (Patti) and Doug E. Doug (Zeke) are the leads. Ricci is no Hayley Mills, nor is Doug a Jones, but I still liked them together. Michael McKean (Peter) is also involved, as is Pixar staple John Ratzenberger (Dusty) - who, alongside Mark Christopher Lawrence (Rollo), play a part in the finale. This has a very low average rating on Letterboxd, which I can completely understand. For me, though, I found it so bizarre that it actually works in a twisted sort of way. Would I recommend this? I dunno. Was I entertained? Surprisingly, yeah. ...and yes, I'm fully aware I did just do a five-paragraph review about 'That Darn Cat' (1997)... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
