Is The Amorous Prawn Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, The Amorous Prawn is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:The Amorous Prawn is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy genre.
Answer: Yes, The Amorous Prawn is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1962, The Amorous Prawn emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of While her husband, the General is abroad, Lady Fitzadam decides to convert their army residence into a fishing resort for rich American tourists in order to raise money for their dream retirement cottage. Unlike standard genre fare, The Amorous Prawn attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Amorous Prawn features a noteworthy lineup led by Ian Carmichael . Supported by the likes of Cecil Parker and Joan Greenwood , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of The Amorous Prawn (1962) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.3/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: The Amorous Prawn is a Comedy film that brings laughter through clever writing and comedic timing, offering both entertainment and social commentary. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: The Amorous Prawn concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of The Amorous Prawn reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.3/10, and global collection metrics, The Amorous Prawn stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1962 cinematic year.
The Amorous Prawn has received mixed reviews with a 6.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
The Amorous Prawn is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Comedy movies, but read reviews first.
The Amorous Prawn may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Joan Greenwood is at her plummy best as "Lady Fitzadam", wife of a British army general who is sent on an overseas mission. She has a grand house and, quite literally, an army of servants at a time when such facilities are at a premium. So, having established that there is a small fortune to be made, she is soon in cahoots with Ian Carmichael "Cpl. Green" and Liz Fraser "Suzie" and opens up their Scottish home to wealthy Americans who want to come and try their hands at salmon fishing. It's all going quite well, money is rolling in and they are successfully fleecing their visitors - including Robert Beatty "Hoffman" and Robert Nichols "Goulansky" - until her husband (Cecil Parker) makes an unexpectedly early return bearing a letter than confirms his imminent retirement - much to their chagrin. Irked at his disgraceful treatment, the two expand their money-making scheme and even manage to rope in the visiting Minister for War (Dennis Price). It's good fun for about an hour. The the humour is gentle and subtle, the wheezes are engaging and Beatty makes for quite a fun mark, but Anthony Kimmins drags out the story for too long and by the time the usually reliable Price (and his moustache) makes his appearance, I was just a bit bored with it all. It's still a good fun adaptation of the play, but is maybe just ten years too late...?
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.