Is The Crawling Eye Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, The Crawling Eye is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 84 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:The Crawling Eye is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Science Fiction genre.
Answer: Maybe not, The Crawling Eye is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 84 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1958, The Crawling Eye emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Science Fiction domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A United Nations investigator crosses paths with a pair of psychic sisters on his way to Trollenberg observatory in the Swiss Alps, which has been plagued by a series of mountaineer disappearances that may be related to a radioactive cloud at the mountain's south face. Unlike standard genre fare, The Crawling Eye attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Crawling Eye features a noteworthy lineup led by Forrest Tucker . Supported by the likes of Jennifer Jayne and Janet Munro , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of The Crawling Eye (1958) is negative. With an audience rating of 4.7/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: The Crawling Eye is a Horror, Science Fiction film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: The Crawling Eye attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of The Crawling Eye reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:








Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.7/10, and global collection metrics, The Crawling Eye stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1958 cinematic year.
The Crawling Eye is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.7/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.7/10, The Crawling Eye may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
The Crawling Eye may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
The Crawling Eye. The filmic adaptation of a 1956 UK TV serial of the same name, The Trollenberg Terror is a whole bunch of fun and not deserving of the stinker reputation it has in some sci-fi loving circles. Action is set in Trollenberg, Switzerland and concerns a creature from outer space that has taken residence in a radioactive cloud atop of the Trollenberg mountain. As the bodies start to pile up and various climbers go missing on the mountain, the United Nations send a boffin to help the local scientists to hopefully solve the mystery. The effects work has been the source of some disdain, and in truth it’s poor but not the worst from the 1950s pantheon of “B” schlockers. The back projection scenes are crude, but again in keeping with the fun aspects of the genre and era. However, Jimmy Sangster’s screenplay is tight and produces brainy conversations and strong sequences. Horror comes by way of headless bodies turning up and that once sane people turn into maniacs as “the terror” weaves its magic. On the normal human side the narrative is given a boost by Janet Munro’s (excellent) telepathic darling, something which troubles the visitors greatly and puts her in grave danger. The psychological aspects of the story mark this out as a genre piece of worth. Elsewhere director Quentin Lawrence does a study job with what is available to him, Forest Tucker is the hero in waiting, playing it reserved like, and Warren Mitchell proves good foil for Tucker and the Terror! It’s not a great film, but it is a good one, let down in some tech departments for sure, but strengths elsewhere make up for its flaws. 7/10
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.