Performance & Direction: The End of the Game Review
Last updated: February 5, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is The End of the Game (1960) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 6.0/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Documentary.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and The End of the Game features a noteworthy lineup led by Knud Lundberg . Supported by the likes of Henning Skaarup and Gunnar 'Nu' Hansen , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: The End of the Game
Quick Plot Summary: The End of the Game is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: The End of the Game
Ending Breakdown: The End of the Game concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the documentary themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of The End of the Game reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch The End of the Game?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Documentaries films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of the cast or director
- Want solid genre entertainment
Top Cast: The End of the Game
All Cast & Crew →
The End of the Game Parents Guide & Age Rating
1960 AdvisoryWondering about The End of the Game age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of The End of the Game is 17 minutes (17m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 6.0/10, and global performance metrics, The End of the Game is classified as a ABOVE AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1960 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is The End of the Game worth watching?
The End of the Game is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies. It has a verified rating of 6/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find The End of the Game parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for The End of the Game identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of The End of the Game?
The total duration of The End of the Game is 17 minutes, which is approximately 0h 17m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked The End of the Game
How The End of the Game Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for The End of the Game
This is a dated but still quite interesting documentary that looks at the role of recreational activities in society, but also at the part played by the audiences too. From swimming to gymnastics, athletics to football the archive illustrates the benefits to body and soul of participating, but then we visit the cinema and the emphasis starts to highlight more the role of the fans. Some are enthusiastic family members, others wielding huge great beer glasses get behind their teams and then finally, we explore the political aspects of the “masses”. The Romans knew it as they packed the coliseum and Adolf Hitler knew it, too. The photography illustrates a social diversity here - men, women, young and old all take part and the gamut of emotions is there for us to see in many of it’s guises as the people deal with the successes and the failures that unfold before their eyes. It’s a look at the need for people to congregate, to compete, ideally to win and is busily cut together imbuing us with some sense of (it’s) purpose and of collectivity.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.





