Verdict:The Haunting of the Tower of London is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, History genre.
Answer: Maybe not, The Haunting of the Tower of London is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2022, The Haunting of the Tower of London emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of The Two Princes, imprisoned and allegedly murdered in the Bloody Tower within the Tower Of London by Richard III. Unlike standard genre fare, The Haunting of the Tower of London attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Haunting of the Tower of London features a noteworthy lineup led by Natalie Martins . Supported by the likes of Derek Nelson and James Swanton , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of The Haunting of the Tower of London (2022) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.8/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: The Haunting of the Tower of London is a Horror, History film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: The Haunting of the Tower of London attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of The Haunting of the Tower of London reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
The Haunting of the Tower of London draws heavily from documented historical records. As a horror, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: The Haunting of the Tower of London adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeAmazon VideoApple TVGoogle Play MoviesYouTubeFandango At HomeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.8/10, and global collection metrics, The Haunting of the Tower of London stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2022 cinematic year.
The Haunting of the Tower of London has received mixed reviews with a 5.8/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
The Haunting of the Tower of London is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Horror, History movies, but read reviews first.
The Haunting of the Tower of London may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Set during the dying days of England's King Edward IV, this is a speculative version of the events that removed his legitimate heir and his brother and smoothed the process of ensuring that Richard III succeeded to give battle in vain. Now I say speculative because this has largely abandoned the history and supplanted it with the vivid imagination of auteur Charlie Steeds. He can't have had much money or time for anything here, but despite that he manages to film a certain effective eeriness to the scenarios. There is, however, nothing more to be said for this fanciful, slightly kinky, and really quite risible tale of usurpation. The acting is as bad as the writing - and that's saying something. Richard Rowden and Reece Connolly come across little better than easy on the eye drama school students and Tim Cartwright's attempt at portraying the megalomanic Richard III can be guaranteed to remind you of the original "Blackadder" series from forty years earlier. The myths about the princes in the tower are a great seam for film makers. This one? Well it's one that needs to be planted six feet under!
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
