Is The House on 92nd Street Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, The House on 92nd Street is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Thriller movies.
It features a runtime of 88 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:The House on 92nd Street is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Thriller genre.
Answer: Yes, The House on 92nd Street is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Thriller movies.
It features a runtime of 88 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1945, The House on 92nd Street emerges as a significant entry in the Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of The US Government tries to track down embedded Nazi agents in the States. Unlike standard genre fare, The House on 92nd Street attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Thriller is often anchored by its ensemble, and The House on 92nd Street features a noteworthy lineup led by William Eythe . Supported by the likes of Lloyd Nolan and Signe Hasso , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of The House on 92nd Street (1945) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.5/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: The House on 92nd Street is a Thriller film that builds tension through unpredictable twists and keeps audiences guessing until the final reveal. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: The House on 92nd Street concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to thriller resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of The House on 92nd Street reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $2.5M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |









fuboTV
FlixFling
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
FlixFling
Amazon Video
Apple TV
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
FlixFlingAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.5/10, and global collection metrics, The House on 92nd Street stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1945 cinematic year.
The House on 92nd Street has received mixed reviews with a 6.5/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
The House on 92nd Street is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
The House on 92nd Street is currently available for streaming on fuboTV. You can also check for it on platforms like fuboTV, FlixFling depending on your region.
Charles Booth won an Oscar for his writing on this early drama-documentary depicting the hunt by the FBI for an established network of Nazi fifth columnists long since operating in the USA. It falls to agent "Bill Dietrich" (William Eythe) to infiltrate the cell and to find out who is ultimately giving the orders - the mysterious "Mr. Christopher". Reporting to "Insp, Briggs" (Lloyd Nolan) he treads a perilous path as his newfound friends doubt his backstory and suspect him of being a double-agent. I was put off by the overly earnest narrative from Reed Hadley, and the acting is all pretty lacklustre aside from Leo G. Carroll as the duplicitous "Col. Hammersohn" who is feeding the information to "Dietrich" whilst simultaneously trying to verify his identity. The ending is all too predictable and that really lets it down quite badly. For such a sophisticated network of spies to be quite so easy to identify is doubtless meant to be a testament to the skills of the wartime FBI, but as a device for a story, it lacks credibility: the fire escape, really? Henry Hathaway keeps it moving along well enough but the story leaves just too obvious a trail of breadcrumbs for it to be intriguing, or plausible.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise