The Lurker
Performance & Direction: The Lurker Review
Last updated: January 26, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is The Lurker (2019) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 2.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Lurker features a noteworthy lineup led by Scout Taylor-Compton . Supported by the likes of Naomi Grossman and Ari Lehman , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of The Lurker (2019) is negative. With an audience rating of 2.8/10, it stands as a challenging project that may struggle to find an audience.
Story & Plot Summary: The Lurker
Quick Plot Summary: The Lurker is a Horror, Mystery, Thriller film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: The Lurker
Ending Breakdown: The Lurker attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the horror themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of The Lurker reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch The Lurker?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Horror films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: The Lurker
All Cast & Crew →







Where to Watch The Lurker Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home🏷️ Buy on
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeThe Lurker Parents Guide & Age Rating
2019 AdvisoryWondering about The Lurker age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of The Lurker is 74 minutes (1h 14m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 2.8/10, and global performance metrics, The Lurker is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 2019 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is The Lurker worth watching?
The Lurker is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 2.8/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find The Lurker parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for The Lurker identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of The Lurker?
The total duration of The Lurker is 74 minutes, which is approximately 1h 14m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked The Lurker
How The Lurker Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for The Lurker
Scout Taylor-Compton and maybe like one of the other girls in this do a pretty good job, but **everyone** else is bad. I'd be lying if I said that I outright hated _The Lurker_, but it'd be an even bigger lie to say that it was any good. _Final rating:★½: - Boring/disappointing. Avoid where possible._
The Lurker is a love letter to the slashers of yesteryear. Unfortunately, it's like the letters Viggo Mortensen writes to his wife in Green Book before Mahershala Ali starts tutoring him. The soundtrack consists of a stark synthesizer, and the name of the high school is Crystal Lake High; these two choices are a little too on the nose even for a 'homage', but it's the casting where the makers go too far – too far back in time, that is; they chose actors who were born in the 80's to play schoolboys and schoolgirls, for no discernible reason other than that was the era during which these films were at their peak. Taylor Wilson, the protagonist, is played by Scout Taylor-Compton, who is 31 years old – and not even a very youthful 31; when her character turns out to be pregnant it's a surprise only because looking at her one would think her ovaries withered and died a long time ago). And that's nothing compared to Miles, whose actor, Michael Emery, is 37 years old (a rather hard-lived 37, from the looks of it); that's older than the actor who plays his father. Ironically, Taylor and Miles have the Romeo and Juliet roles in the school play – the irony being that they are one hag short of Macbeth's Three Witches. I'd say this is director Eric Liberacki figuratively winking at the audience, but The Lurker takes the rest of its material seriously, or at least as seriously as this material can be taken.
**_Scout Taylor-Compton in a slasher akin to “Scream,” albeit low-budget_** During the production of a play at a high school in the Chicago area, theater students and members of the faculty are preyed upon by a mysterious lurker in a bird's beak plague mask. "The Lurker" (2019) was described by producers as “an ode to 80’s slashers,” which is true, but it has more in common with “Scream” from the mid-90s, walking the balance beam between serious slasher and semi-parody. Remember Henry Winkler's weird principal? You’ll get the same curiously hammy performances with the drama club teacher and the father at the party house. You also get the unnecessarily mean-spirited characters with a few exceptions, like the interesting long-haired janitor. Scout is, of course, a highlight as the protagonist. She was soon-to-turn 30 during shooting and barely acceptable as a 17-18 years-old student, but this isn’t exactly uncommon in filmmaking seeing as how Roddy McDowall played a high school student when he was 36 in “Lord, Love a Duck.” Petite Kali Skatchke is another standout in the feminine department as Emma. There are a couple of other notables, but the director unfortunately didn’t know how to shoot women (no pun intended) in the manner of, say, the original “Friday the 13th” or “Slumber Party Massacre II.” The story is a whodunnit and the revelation at the end is good; proficient writing on that front. The gore’s well-done as well, for those who care. Unfortunately, there are some technical issues, like questionable dubbing and editing, which offers a kind of off-kilter viewing experience and smacks of inept or low-rent filmmaking. Despite my criticisms, it’s entertaining enough to make it worth checking out for fans of the genre. The movie is short ‘n’ sweet at 1 hour, 14 minutes. It was shot in Chicago. GRADE: C-/C
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.









