Is The Mummy's Hand Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, The Mummy's Hand is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 67 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:The Mummy's Hand is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror, Fantasy genre.
Answer: Maybe not, The Mummy's Hand is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 67 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1940, The Mummy's Hand emerges as a significant entry in the Horror, Fantasy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A couple of young, out-of-work archaeologists in Egypt discover evidence of the burial place of the ancient Egyptian princess Ananka. Unlike standard genre fare, The Mummy's Hand attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Mummy's Hand features a noteworthy lineup led by Dick Foran . Supported by the likes of Peggy Moran and Wallace Ford , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of The Mummy's Hand (1940) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.7/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: The Mummy's Hand is a Horror, Fantasy film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: The Mummy's Hand attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of The Mummy's Hand reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $84.0K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for The Mummy's Hand is $84.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.









Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.7/10, and global collection metrics, The Mummy's Hand stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1940 cinematic year.
The Mummy's Hand has received mixed reviews with a 5.7/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
The Mummy's Hand is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Horror, Fantasy movies, but read reviews first.
The Mummy's Hand may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Not a bad movie for a rainy Saturday afternoon. It's a little serious and a little bit fun. Keep an open mind and realize this isn't a million dollar production and it can be very enjoyable.
Ultimately, this spawned three sequels that develop the tales of "Kharis" (this time Tom Tyler) as he is raised from his perpetual living death to reconcile with his "Princess Ananka". By far the best of them, this film starts off with Dick Foran ("Steve Banning) and Wallace Ford ("Babe Johnson") as two hapless archaeologists who accidentally discover and defile the tomb of "Kharis" who, together with his menacing, megalomanic High Priest "Andoheb" (George Zucco) are not best pleased. Revived by his potent elixir of Tan leaves, the mummy sets off to wreak vengeance on his desecrators - and, of course, to find his long lost gal whom he hopes will buy into his new "been in a terrible fire/hospital" look. The production is a bit basic - there is plenty of repetitive use of the same shots but the cast/writing in this are quite decent - Cecil Kellaway and Eduardo Cianelli are quite effective at keeping the story moving along between strangulations and it's got quite a good conclusion too. No relation to Karloff's 1932 version, but still quite an enjoyable development go the them that I rather enjoyed.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise