Performance & Direction: The Ploughman's Lunch Review
Last updated: January 29, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is The Ploughman's Lunch (1983) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 4.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Drama.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Ploughman's Lunch features a noteworthy lineup led by Jonathan Pryce . Supported by the likes of Tim Curry and Rosemary Harris , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: The Ploughman's Lunch
Quick Plot Summary: The Ploughman's Lunch is a Drama film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through detailed character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: The Ploughman's Lunch
Ending Breakdown: The Ploughman's Lunch attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the drama themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of The Ploughman's Lunch reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch The Ploughman's Lunch?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Drama films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: The Ploughman's Lunch
All Cast & Crew →









Where to Watch The Ploughman's Lunch Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
Shout! Factory Amazon Channel🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video🏷️ Buy on
Amazon VideoThe Ploughman's Lunch Parents Guide & Age Rating
1983 AdvisoryWondering about The Ploughman's Lunch age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of The Ploughman's Lunch is 107 minutes (1h 47m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 4.8/10, and global performance metrics, The Ploughman's Lunch is classified as a AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1983 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is The Ploughman's Lunch worth watching?
The Ploughman's Lunch is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies. It has a verified rating of 4.8/10 and stands as a AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find The Ploughman's Lunch parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for The Ploughman's Lunch identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of The Ploughman's Lunch?
The total duration of The Ploughman's Lunch is 107 minutes, which is approximately 1h 47m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked The Ploughman's Lunch
How The Ploughman's Lunch Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for The Ploughman's Lunch
With rumblings coming from the wires about some Argentine activity on the remote island of South Georgia and Margaret Thatcher’s first administration struggling to deal with the gloomy British economic outlook, jaded radio journalist “Penfield” (Jonathan Pryce) finds himself trying to stay motivated despite the fact that he hasn’t a penny to his name. In search of at least a degree of self-fulfilment, he decides to write a book all about the Franco-British invasion on the Suez Canal in 1956. He has an interest in the geo-political dynamics and history of those turbulent events, and so sets about lining up some interviewees to put some flesh on the bones and it’s whilst he is researching, he encounters the redoubtable “Ann” (Rosemary Harris) whose left wing political agenda chimes a little with his but more revealingly shows him up as a bit of an intellectual lightweight. Indeed, his lack of societal “evolution” is all too clearly demonstrated as he visits his poorly mother and his father, both traditional working class and proud parents, with whom he has but a tangential connection nowadays. To be honest, I found this all to be a little too pedestrian and introspective a tale of a man who probably started out as an idealist but who was complicit in letting the system grind him down into a supercilious cynic. Pryce delivers well enough but with so little by way of characterisation to work with it all rather drearily meanders along. Harris, on the other hand, has less to do but makes much more of her role as a women still tainted by life, but much more in control of what she thinks and what she wants. Of course there is some political commentary here, and a thinly veiled critique of all things Conservative and capitalist - either contemporary or during Suez when Eden was at the British helm, but that’s also rather undercooked and disappointingly predictable. All in all it comes across as a television movie in terms of the production, the score and the photography and though watchable enough as a comment on Britain at the time, isn’t really very memorable.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Useful Links
More with Jonathan Pryce










