The Reivers
The Reivers Review: Story, Cast, Rating & Final Verdict
Last updated: April 10, 2026
Movie Overview: The Reivers
| Movie | The Reivers |
| Release Year | 1969 |
| Director | Mark Rydell |
| Genre | Comedy / Drama |
| Runtime | 106 minutes |
| Language | EN |
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is The Reivers (1969) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 6.3/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Comedy.
Cast & Character Study
The performances in The Reivers are led by Steve McQueen . The supporting cast, including Sharon Farrell and Ruth White , provides the necessary layers to the central narrative.
movieMx Verdict: Is it Worth Your Time?
What Works in the Movie
While The Reivers does not fully realize its potential, it still contains moments that may appeal to viewers who enjoy Comedy films.
- Interesting concept or premise
- Some entertaining scenes
- Supporting cast delivers occasional highlights
What Doesn't Work
Despite its strengths, The Reivers has a few issues that may affect the overall viewing experience, particularly in terms of pacing and narrative consistency.
- Uneven pacing in certain parts of the film
- Some predictable plot developments
- May not appeal to audiences outside the Comedy fanbase
Story & Plot Summary: The Reivers
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1969, The Reivers is a Comedy, Drama film directed by Mark Rydell. The narrative brings laughter through sharp writing and comedic timing, providing amusement while touching on deeper societal themes. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Steve McQueen.
Ending Explained: The Reivers
The Reivers Ending Explained: Directed by Mark Rydell, The Reivers wraps up the main storyline while leaving some interpretation to viewers. The ending highlights the core comedy themes developed throughout the film.
The emotional resolution focuses on the transformation of its main characters, particularly in scenes involving Steve McQueen. The interpretation of the ending may vary among viewers.
Key Elements of the Ending
- Narrative Resolution: The story resolves its primary conflict while leaving room for interpretation.
- Character Development: Character motivations become clearer by the final scenes.
- Thematic Message: The ending reinforces the comedy themes introduced earlier in the film.
The final moments of The Reivers reflect the creative choices of the filmmakers and align with the tone of the narrative.
Who Should Watch The Reivers?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Comedy films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of Steve McQueen or the director
- Want some laughs and light entertainment
Top Cast: The Reivers
All Cast & Crew →



























Where to Watch The Reivers Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Amazon VideoThe Reivers Parents Guide & Age Rating
1969 AdvisoryWondering about The Reivers age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of The Reivers is 106 minutes (1h 46m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 6.3/10, and global performance metrics, The Reivers is classified as a ABOVE AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1969 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is The Reivers worth watching?
The Reivers is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies. It has a verified rating of 6.3/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find The Reivers parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for The Reivers identifies it as PG-13. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of The Reivers?
The total duration of The Reivers is 106 minutes, which is approximately 1h 46m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked The Reivers
How The Reivers Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for The Reivers
**_McQueen hams it up in Faulkner’s early 1900’s Southern misadventure_** In northern Mississippi, 1905, the first automobile is brought to town, a yellow Winton Flyer, bought by the patriarch of the McCaslin family (Will Geer). A likable rapscallion named Boon (Steve McQueen) talks the 11 year-old McCaslin grandson (Mitch Vogel) into going to Memphis in the “borrowed” vehicle for a few days while gramps is out of town for a funeral. Rupert Crosse joins the fun trip and Sharon Farrell plays a woman of ill repute in Memphis. Based on William Faulkner’s last novel, "The Reivers” (1969) is a picaresque tale that’s worth seeing just for the primitive automobile. Steve called the vehicle “the real star of the picture” and acquired it after filming for his personal collection. Yet the exploits of the colorful protagonists are entertaining in a fun way. However, the tone is initially jarring, combining the air of a Disney kid’s flick from that era with adult bits, like staying overnight at a brothel and everything that goes with it. I should add that there’s no nudity except for a full-bodied painting on the wall in the boy’s bedroom, which he amusingly gazes at with fascination. Being too adult-oriented for children and not meaty enough for adults, the movie unsurprisingly failed to connect with audiences at the box office, leading McQueen to later lament that it made him look like “the village idiot.” While it is true that he comes across as an “Aw shucks” simpleton, the character of Boon IS a man-child, an adult who still behaves like an irresponsible child. Meanwhile the kid is the real star since it’s his coming-of-age story. On the female front, Sharon Farrell is reminiscent of Ann-Margret and was one of the most beautiful women to walk the earth in her prime. Meanwhile redhead Diane Shalet is on hand as Hannah. If what I said interests you, check it out, but "Paper Moon" (1973) is a better choice for this kind o’ flick. It lacks the curious hammy approach of McQueen (and a couple others, to lesser degree). The film runs 1 hour, 47 minutes, and was shot in Greenwood & Carrolton, Mississippi, with the horse racing sequences (obviously) done at Walt Disney's Golden Oak Ranch in Newhall, California, which is located in the high country just north of Hollywood and east of Santa Clarita. GRADE: B-/C+
This reminded me of one of those live-action films that Disney put out in the 1960s and 70s. A big star (Steve McQueen) is friends with a young lad (Mitch Vogel) and together with his cheeky friend “Ned” (Rupert Crosse) they “borrow” the bright yellow Lincoln motor car of his grandfather (Will Geer) and head off for some adventures. First things first, to Memphis they travel where “Boon” (McQ) is hoping to see his gal (Sharon Farrell) who works in an house unsuitable for an eleven year old boy! Whilst they are preoccupied, “Ned” hits upon the idea of trading in the car - remember that roads aren’t so prevalent and mud still is - for an horse! When “Boon” discovers the news, he knows he has to get the car back before they go home and all hell breaks loose. All the while, the shy and decently brought up “Lucius” (Vogel) is having his eyes opened! There looks like there is only one way to get the vehicle back, and that’s for them to win the local derby. Neither “Boon” nor “Ned” really know one end of an horse from the other, whereas “Lucius” is not only no slouch on that front, but he also weighs a good deal less. Perhaps if he can win the race, they can get the car back? Quite why anyone would want a luminous yellow car in this territory in the first place is anyone’s guess, but this one soon gets used to mud! This is a very gentle coming-of-age story that’s not just about the young man, but his older friend too and it’s peppered with daft scenarios that showcase the charm of the star and the quality of the creatively designed production as it moves along in a fashion for an admittedly overdone two hours. It isn’t especially original, no, but everyone here looks like they are having fun (except, perhaps, the goldfish in the brothel) and it’s mischief tempered with a hint or moral sentiment is watchable enough.
This reminded me of one of those live-action films that Disney put out in the 1960s and 70s. A big star (Steve McQueen) is friends with a young lad (Mitch Vogel) and together with his cheeky friend “Ned” (Rupert Crosse) they “borrow” the bright yellow Lincoln motor car of his grandfather (Will Geer) and head off for some adventures. First things first, to Memphis they travel where “Boon” (McQ) is hoping to see his gal (Sharon Farrell) who works in an house unsuitable for an eleven year old boy! Whilst they are preoccupied, “Ned” hits upon the idea of trading in the car - remember that roads aren’t so prevalent and mud still is - for an horse! When “Boon” discovers the news, he knows he has to get the car back before they go home and all hell breaks loose. All the while, the shy and decently brought up “Lucius” (Vogel) is having his eyes opened! There looks like there is only one way to get the vehicle back, and that’s for them to win the local derby. Neither “Boon” nor “Ned” really know one end of an horse from the other, whereas “Lucius” is not only no slouch on that front, but he also weighs a good deal less. Perhaps if he can win the race, they can get the car back? Quite why anyone would want a luminous yellow car in this territory in the first place is anyone’s guess, but this one soon gets used to mud! This is a very gentle coming-of-age story that’s not just about the young man, but his older friend too and it’s peppered with daft scenarios that showcase the charm of the star and the quality of the creatively designed production as it moves along in an amiable fashion for an admittedly overlong two hours. It isn’t especially original, no, but everyone here looks like they are having fun (except, perhaps, the goldfish in the brothel) and it’s mischief tempered with a hint or moral sentiment is watchable enough.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










