Is The Second Chance Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, The Second Chance is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:The Second Chance is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 5.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama genre.
Answer: Maybe not, The Second Chance is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 102 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2006, The Second Chance emerges as a significant entry in the Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Ethan Jenkins and Jake Sanders are both passionate pastors who worship the same God from the same book--but that's where the similarity ends. Unlike standard genre fare, The Second Chance attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Second Chance features a noteworthy lineup led by Michael W. Smith . Supported by the likes of Jeff Obafemi Carr and J. Don Ferguson , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of The Second Chance (2006) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.9/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: The Second Chance is a Drama film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through nuanced character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: The Second Chance attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of The Second Chance reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Consider Watching If:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $1.2M |
| Worldwide Gross | $463.5K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for The Second Chance is $1.2M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.




Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 5.9/10, and global collection metrics, The Second Chance stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2006 cinematic year.
The Second Chance has received mixed reviews with a 5.9/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
The Second Chance is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama movies, but read reviews first.
The Second Chance may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
**_A tale of two very different assemblies in the heart of America_** The associate pastor of a megachurch outside Nashville (Michael W. Smith) is given the temporary assignment of helping out his dad’s original assembly in the inner city, pastored by a “loose cannon” (Jeff Obafemi Carr). “The Second Chance” (2006) was helmed by Steve Taylor, known for his good run in the 80s in the Christian rock market and songs like “I Want to Be a Clone,” which satirized mindsets or practices that irked him. It’s in the mold of films like “Grand Canyon” and “Levity,” which try to balance the reverence and beauty of life with the profane, foolish and ugly. Yet those movies had way more money to work with and so could afford grade ‘A’ actors in the cast. While “Grand Canyon” is far superior to this, this is about on par with “Levity,” just with slightly more overt spirituality. The future “Do You Believe?” is similar, but all-around better. It starts with potential and is quite good through the first half, but then sort of fizzles out in the second. The script needed rewritten for a more compelling last act. Nevertheless, there’s a lot of worthwhile bits, like the conundrum of walking in love when, at certain times, you might want to kick someone’s butt. Yet there are some bothersome aspects, such as the idea that the plight of minorities in the inner city is more important than people living in the more affluent suburbs. The location doesn’t change the fact that people are people and have to deal with the same core issues of life in a fallen world, along with the struggle with one’s own flesh, aka sinful nature. Also, Caucasians aren’t to blame for the problems in the black community. Those of African descent need to look after their own and manage their own affairs, not to mention appreciate any assistance by “whitey” and not begrudge it. At the same time, the black pastor’s frustration and angst are understandable in light of problems well documented in “Do the Right Thing,” which honestly addressed the issue of “white flight.” But, please, quit shifting blame to the Caucasian or Asian communities. Victimhood idiotology must be wholly rejected for true progress to be made. When it came out, some critics curiously decried the use of cursing, but there’s hardly any here beyond a couple occasions of people saying “hell” or “damn.” One example is near the beginning where the black minister says to the megachurch congregation that his assembly needed people to come and serve in the challenging locale of the hood. If they couldn't do that, "then keep your damn money." It's edgy and arguably shouldn't have been said to an entire congregation, but I'd hardly classify it as profanity. I hear way worse standing in line at Dairy Queen. It runs 1 hour, 42 minutes, and was shot in the area of the Lindsley Avenue Church of Christ in Nashville, as well as Brentwood Baptist Church in Brentwood, which is 11 miles south of the city. It cost $1.2 million and grossed $463,542 at the box office, naturally making additional money via rentals and DVD/Blu-ray sales. But that didn’t change the fact that it was a financial flop, causing Steve Taylor to flee from filmmaking. The only movie he’s done since is “Blue Like Jazz” six years later, which I have yet to see. GRADE: B-/C+
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.