Is The Third Blow Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, The Third Blow is likely a skip if you enjoy War movies.
It features a runtime of 106 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:The Third Blow is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 2.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the War, History genre.
Answer: Maybe not, The Third Blow is likely a skip if you enjoy War movies.
It features a runtime of 106 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1948, The Third Blow emerges as a significant entry in the War, History domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of On April 1944, Joseph Stalin orders the Red Army to liberate the Crimea from the German occupiers. Unlike standard genre fare, The Third Blow attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any War is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Third Blow features a noteworthy lineup led by Ivan Pereverzev . Supported by the likes of Mark Bernes and Mikhail Astangov , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of The Third Blow (1948) is negative. With an audience rating of 2.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: The Third Blow is a War, History film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: The Third Blow attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to war resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of The Third Blow reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
The Third Blow draws heavily from documented historical records. As a war, history film, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement.
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: The Third Blow adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Consider Watching If:










Kinopoisk
KinopoiskAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 2/10, and global collection metrics, The Third Blow stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1948 cinematic year.
The Third Blow is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 2/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 2/10, The Third Blow may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
The Third Blow is currently available for streaming on Kinopoisk. You can also check for it on platforms like Kinopoisk depending on your region.
No reviews found for this filter.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.