Is The Time Machine Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, The Time Machine is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:The Time Machine is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Science Fiction, Adventure, Action genre.
Answer: Yes, The Time Machine is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2002, The Time Machine emerges as a significant entry in the Science Fiction, Adventure, Action domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Hoping to alter the events of the past, a 19th century inventor instead travels 800,000 years into the future, where he finds mankind divided into two warring races. Unlike standard genre fare, The Time Machine attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The success of any Science Fiction is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Time Machine features a noteworthy lineup led by Guy Pearce . Supported by the likes of Mark Addy and Phyllida Law , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of The Time Machine (2002) is mixed. With an audience rating of 6.3/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Quick Plot Summary: The Time Machine is a Science Fiction, Adventure, Action film that explores futuristic concepts and technological possibilities while examining humanity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
The film presents its narrative with careful attention to pacing and character development. Hoping to alter the events of the past, a 19th century inventor instead travels 800,000 years into the future, where he finds mankind divided into two warring races. The story unfolds naturally, allowing viewers to become invested in the outcome while maintaining engagement throughout.
Ending Breakdown: The Time Machine concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to science fiction resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of The Time Machine reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $80.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $123.7M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for The Time Machine is $80.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.








Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.3/10, and global collection metrics, The Time Machine stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2002 cinematic year.
The Time Machine has received mixed reviews with a 6.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
The Time Machine is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Science Fiction, Adventure, Action movies, but read reviews first.
The Time Machine may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Some interesting and even ambitious aspects but this sci-fi thriller was pretty uneven while the visual effects were also a mixed bag from being fairly impressive for its time (20 years now) to pretty shoddy. On the plus side, Guy Pearce was good in the lead. This one also reminded me when Orlando Jones was in a good amount of movies (18 between 1998-2004). IDK, this is one that did keep me entertained. **3.0/5**
I don't know how to approach this one. "The Time Machine" is one of those stories that, rereading it, beings back vivid memories. One of my best friends in high school loaned it to me, I stored it away in my backpack for about a month and then...when we had a field trip to The Board of Trade, I scrounged it out and read it on the train ride. It was one of those stories that is so short I could rip through it in the hour and fifteen minutes between our small town and Chicago. To this day, every time I go back to it, it brings me back to 1997 and, to this day, I distinctly remember finishing it about the time the train stopped and I remember walking into the crowded city feeling like I was in a different world. The story had moved me out of reality so much Chicago seemed jarring. And then they made it into a movie, a remake of a movie and, watching it, I don't know, I didn't have that same sense of being in a totally different world that the book gave me... And the movie, in my mind, has to live up to that experience in some small way. Or at least give you that feeling that same feeling that the world was still spinning that one gets when they walk out of a movie and discover that it had rained. It's an engrossing story and The Time Machine didn't seem to whisk me away like the book did. I can't help but feel it deserved better. It felt like I was watching a movie and, honestly, it gave me the same since that Jackson's King Kong did, it felt like it was trying and horribly, miserably failed. I left feeling "meh," and that was after being excited walking into it, I mean, I read it in 1997 and they made a movie in 2002 and, I was expecting the same feeling. I had waited long enough. So, I don't know, I may be overly harsh on it just because I loved what the story did to me so much, the first time I read it and now, as an adult, it doesn't take me to another world, it takes me back to 1997 again, and high school, and that hour fifteen minute train ride to Chicago. So ultimately, it could be a halfway decent film that I just hate because the story had such a jarring effect on me when I first encountered it.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.