Is The Times of Harvey Milk Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, The Times of Harvey Milk is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:The Times of Harvey Milk is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 7.2/10, it has delivered a compelling experience for fans of the Documentary genre.
Answer: Yes, The Times of Harvey Milk is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a solid storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1984, The Times of Harvey Milk emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Harvey Milk was an outspoken human rights activist and one of the first openly gay U. Unlike standard genre fare, The Times of Harvey Milk attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a refreshing take on its central themes.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Times of Harvey Milk features a noteworthy lineup led by Harvey Milk . Supported by the likes of Harvey Fierstein and Anne Kronenberg , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
In summary, our editorial assessment of The Times of Harvey Milk (1984) is overwhelmingly positive. With an audience rating of 7.2/10, it stands as a mandatory watch for any serious cinema lover.
Quick Plot Summary: The Times of Harvey Milk is a Documentary film that presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Breakdown: The Times of Harvey Milk resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to documentary resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
The final moments of The Times of Harvey Milk reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Worth Watching If You:


MUBI
MUBI Amazon ChannelAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 7.2/10, and global collection metrics, The Times of Harvey Milk stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1984 cinematic year.
The Times of Harvey Milk is considered a hit based on audience response and box office performance. With a rating of 7.2/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Documentary movies.
Yes, The Times of Harvey Milk is definitely worth watching! It's a must-watch hit for fans of Documentary cinema.
The Times of Harvey Milk is currently available for streaming on MUBI. You can also check for it on platforms like MUBI, MUBI Amazon Channel depending on your region.
I have to admit that I was completely unaware that San Francisco mayor George Moscone was also shot on the same day as Harvey Milk, nor that both were shot by a fellow city supervisor in their offices at City Hall - Dan White. This well-informed documentary begins at the start of Milk’s career where this man of Jewish immigrant heritage begins to assume some civic responsibility for his district. Attempting to get onto the city’s council in the early 1970s, he was able to raise the profile of the difficulties faced by the burgeoning gay population of the Castro and eventually, thanks to a more constituency based electoral process, find himself elected and popular amongst many in a community that were not, necessarily, from his own bailiwick. There is plenty of archive here to illustrate his personable nature and his tenacious attitude to improving the lives and opportunities of ordinary folk, often in the face of hostility from those whose bigotry and/or religiosity were determined to introduce in California, the sort of discriminatory legislation that was arriving in states like Oregon prohibiting homosexuals from being employed in professions like teaching. The narration remains fact-based and the narrative quite plainly presents us with ample supporting evidence and television programming that demonstrates just how ridiculous not just some of these arguments being put forward were, but also how those promulgating homophobic rules and regulations reeked of hypocrisy and double-standards. Unlike with many similar style political documentaries, this one has managed to garner contributions from those who campaigned and knew Milk himself, and it stays focussed on the efforts he made to change for good rather than attempt to broaden or generalise it’s themes - and I think that works better at keeping our attention on a man who was gay and was for gays, but was also for anyone whom he thought needed help. Much is made of other anti-discrimination trail blazers in the United States in the 1970s, and I think this illustrates poignantly that his contribution to equal rights under the law - especially for those too afraid to leave a closet - was as substantial as anyone else’s and deserving of grater plaudits than he has thus far received.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.