The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll
Performance & Direction: The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll Review
Last updated: February 3, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll (1960) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 6.1/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll features a noteworthy lineup led by Paul Massie . Supported by the likes of Dawn Addams and Christopher Lee , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll
Quick Plot Summary: The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll is a Horror, Science Fiction film that crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll
Ending Breakdown: The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the horror themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Horror films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of the cast or director
- Want a few scares and creepy atmosphere
Top Cast: The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll
All Cast & Crew →










Where to Watch The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll Online?
Streaming HubThe Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll Parents Guide & Age Rating
1960 AdvisoryWondering about The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll is 88 minutes (1h 28m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 6.1/10, and global performance metrics, The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll is classified as a ABOVE AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1960 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll worth watching?
The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 6.1/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll?
The total duration of The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll is 88 minutes, which is approximately 1h 28m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll
How The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll
_**Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Handsome Hedonist**_ In wild London of 1874, a reclusive scientist obsessively studies human nature (Paul Massie) while his alluring wife (Dawn Addams) is having a questionable relationship with a smooth gambler (Christopher Lee). The sudden appearance of suave Edward Hyde shakes everything up. Released in 1960-1961, "The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll” (also known as “Jekyll's Inferno” and “House of Fright”) is the second of three Hammer films inspired by Robert Louis Stevenson’s famous story “Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.” It was preceded by the horror comedy “The Ugly Duckling” (1959) and followed by “Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde” (1971). (Please notice I said they’re “inspired by” and not “based on” Stevenson’s novella). The twist in this one is reflected in director Terence Fisher’s belief that the charm of evil is more interesting than a brutish monster, at least to adults. Hence this is more of a psychological horror film as opposed to a creature feature. The theme of the movie, corresponding to Dr. Jekyll's theories (in this version anyway), is that a person's superior self is caged within the individual, shackled by the constraints of societal rules and conventions. He believed the caged person within is the more progressive. Thus Jekyll basically looks like a Neanderthal whereas Hyde looks and behaves like a progressive libertine. The question is: Is the freed hedonist really “progressive” if he/she is morally degenerate? Whilst the flick failed at the box office when released, I found its exploration of human nature fascinating. It helps that the film doesn’t forget to throw in numerous entertaining bits, like a snake-dance by the athletic Norma Marla, a long can-can sequence and Dawn Addams’ witty verbiage, as well as her jaw-dropping scenes in the last act. Interestingly, Marla has only appeared in two movies and they were both Hammer flicks inspired by Robert Louis Stevenson's novella. LOOK OUT for a young Oliver Reed as a nightclub bouncer in the first act. The movie runs 1 hour, 28 minutes and was shot at Bray Studios, just west of London. GRADE: B
Paul Massie is really only competent here as physician "Dr. Jekyll" who is becoming increasingly frustrated by the rather linear approach taken by modern science to the issue of the human psyche. Trapped in a loveless marriage with "Kitty" (Dawn Addams) who is much keener on his parasitical friend "Paul" (Christopher Lee), he devotes more of his time to his work and soon develops a serum that turns an unassuming monkey into a maniac! How might it work on a man? Well, we don't have to wait long to find out as his own self-experimentation leads him to discover some rather nasty character traits in himself, but also some facts about the behaviour of those around him. Can he rein in his new alter ego, the debonaire and manipulative ("Mr. Hyde") or will that more dominant, charismatic, character prevail and drive him to dastardly deeds? Christoper Lee is quite good as the rather odious sponger and the story progresses colourfully and without too many silly visual effects - but it's all a bit slow and wordy. It takes too long to get going and though it does deliver quite cleverly in the last twenty minutes or so, the rest of it is a little too procedural. Still, Terence Fisher does enough to keep this intriguing tale of man's inhumanity to himself running along well enough to engage for ninety minutes.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.









