Performance & Direction: The Yearling Review
Last updated: January 24, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is The Yearling (1994) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.5/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Drama.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Yearling features a noteworthy lineup led by Peter Strauss . Supported by the likes of Jean Smart and Wil Horneff , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
In summary, our editorial assessment of The Yearling (1994) is mixed. With an audience rating of 5.5/10, it stands as a decent one-time watch.
Story & Plot Summary: The Yearling
Quick Plot Summary: The Yearling is a Drama, TV Movie film that explores complex human emotions and relationships through detailed character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict and narrative structure.
Ending Explained: The Yearling
Ending Breakdown: The Yearling attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the drama themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of The Yearling reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch The Yearling?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Drama films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: The Yearling
All Cast & Crew →








Where to Watch The Yearling Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with AdsThe Yearling Parents Guide & Age Rating
1994 AdvisoryWondering about The Yearling age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of The Yearling is 90 minutes (1h 30m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.5/10, and global performance metrics, The Yearling is classified as a ABOVE AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1994 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is The Yearling worth watching?
The Yearling is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies. It has a verified rating of 5.5/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find The Yearling parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for The Yearling identifies it as NR. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of The Yearling?
The total duration of The Yearling is 90 minutes, which is approximately 1h 30m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked The Yearling
How The Yearling Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for The Yearling
**_The hardships of living in the wilds of Florida back in the day_** A couple (Peter Strauss and Jean Smart) and their young son (Wil Horneff) face the challenges of life in the Big Shrub, aka Ocala National Forest in north-central Florida. The things they deal with include a troubling bear, a rattlesnake bite, a flood, and their moonshining neighbors (Philip Seymour Hoffman, Brad Greenquist, etc.). “The Yearling” (1994) sticks close to the 1938 classic novel by Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings, except for two things: It transports the events from the post-Civil War years to the Great Depression and it (wisely) omits Jody’s attempted canoe trip to Boston at the end. While it’s a wilderness drama/adventure, it’s reminiscent of a Western in ways. Speaking of which, 1966’s “The Night of Grizzly” featuring Clint Walker was obviously inspired by Rawlings’ book. While I like that flick, this is the better film, regardless of whether it was made-for-TV. What makes it so good? For one, it successfully puts the viewer in that time and place with authentic locations (no studio sets or SoCal locations like in the 1946 version with Gregory Peck). The cast members really get into their characters, augmented by their grubby clothes and discolored teeth; they’re totally believable. Furthermore, amidst the depressing happenings are warmhearted bits, like the love of the father and son. Plus, the melee at the town party perks up the story and is well done. I’ve been to such get-togethers in real life where the locals assemble for food & drink and things like what transpires in the story really happen. Consider Lem Forrester (Greenquist), we all know troublemakers just like him. It runs 1 hour, 39 minutes, and was shot in the Ocala National Forest area at Silver Springs State Park and Juniper Prairie Wilderness. GRADE: B+/A-
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Useful Links
More with Peter Strauss











